The Supreme Court of India tackled the issue of online content control on Monday, following the backlash caused by podcaster Ranveer Allahbadia’s controversial statements. Allahbadia, who goes by the name BeerBiceps, stirred up trouble with an unsuitable remark on the show “India’s Got Latent,” hosted by comic Samay Raina. His comment, which included a vulgar question about parents and sex, drew sharp criticism from many social media users and led to several police reports being filed.
At the hearing, Justice Surya Kant made it clear: “We don’t want any regulatory regime which is about censorship, but it also cannot be a free-for-all all platform.” He stressed that while the Court opposes censorship, some rules are needed to keep content within what society finds acceptable. The Court told the Centre to come up with a plan to regulate social media content. This plan should be shared so everyone involved can give their thoughts before anything else happens.
Solicitor General Highlight Need for Content Regulation
Solicitor General Tushar Mehta stated that digital platforms must be operated according to the societal norms of India, which may be vastly different from those in other nations. He further stated that while the burning of a national flag may be acceptable in other societies, it is considered a crime in India. He said that the content should not violate accepted standards of decency and morality.
The Court also made it clear that humor should be enjoyable for everyone and not rely on offensive language. “Humour is something that the entire family can enjoy. Using filthy language is not humour,” Justice Kant stated, underscoring the need for quality, non-vulgar entertainment.
Big Relief for Ranveer Allahbadia
In a key development, the Court allowed Allahbadia’s YouTube show, The Ranveer Show, to resume under the condition that he maintains “morality and decency” in his content. The Court instructed him to ensure that his shows were suitable for viewers of all ages.
The Court’s ruling reflects a growing need for a regulatory framework that balances free speech with societal values, ensuring that digital content remains respectful of public morality.
