The Delhi High Court has postponed the scheduled hearing on actor Salman Khan’s legal petition aimed at halting the production, promotion, and release of the film *Kala Hiran: The Battle for Legacy*. This delay follows a request from the filmmakers’ legal counsel for extra time to prepare a response to Khan’s application. The matter is now set to be heard by a roster bench on July 1.

Allegations by Salman Khan

Salman Khan’s petition alleges that the film and its promotional materials unlawfully exploit his personality and publicity rights. Khan contends that the project is based on incidents related to his life without his consent. During the preliminary hearing, Senior Advocate Sandeep Sethi, representing Khan, urged the court to grant an interim injunction to prevent the film’s release and any promotional activities associated with it. He stated, “He is producing a film on my life and tearing up the notice. He has no right to make a film of my life,” emphasising the urgency of the injunction given the already released teaser.

Khan’s legal team claims that the filmmakers did not obtain his approval for using references associated with his life and legal history. However, the filmmakers’ counsel requested additional time to formally respond, arguing that they received a copy of the application only shortly before the proceedings.

At the core of the dispute is the assertion that *Kala Hiran: The Battle for Legacy* draws inspiration from the 1998 blackbuck hunting case linked to Khan, despite not explicitly naming him. The application highlights that promotional materials released for the film contain visual and contextual elements that make Khan easily recognisable.

Concerns Regarding Identity and Legal Matters

Khan’s application further raises concerns about the film’s portrayal of his identity, citing a poster released in May 2026 that allegedly depicts a character resembling him, complete with a bracelet similar to one Khan is known for. He has also objected to representations that show the character with a firearm, contending that such imagery creates a misleading impression, especially given his acquittal in cases under the Arms Act.

Another significant point made by Khan’s legal representatives is that various elements of the film appear to address legal issues currently pending in higher courts. They argue that releasing this material could unduly sway public opinion and impact ongoing legal proceedings. Sethi stressed that Khan’s identity and public image should not be leveraged for promotional gain without his permission.

Filmmakers’ Response and Court Directives

The filmmakers contest the request for any interim relief. Counsel for the filmmakers informed the court that he has allegedly received death threats regarding the matter, prompting him to file a First Information Report (FIR). The court acknowledged the submissions from both sides and noted that the filmmakers had only recently been provided with the complete pleadings.

In light of this, the court instructed Khan’s legal team to ensure that the complete set of documents is shared with the respondents by the end of the day. The respondents in this case comprise producer Amit Jani, Jani FireFox Films, director Bharat Shrinate, Akshay Pandey, and other individuals involved in the project.

The high-profile nature of this case continues to attract attention, with discussions surrounding its implications for both Salman Khan and the filmmakers involved. The next hearing is anticipated to provide further clarity on the ongoing legal saga surrounding the film.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share