China has voiced strong disapproval of a joint statement issued by a coalition of 14 nations, led by the United States and the Philippines, which reiterated support for a 2016 ruling from an international tribunal. This ruling invalidated a significant portion of China’s claims in the South China Sea. Beijing stated that these nations had “blatantly endorsed” what it characterised as an illegal “award.” The coalition included key allies of the US such as Japan, Australia, and Britain.

The coalition affirmed its commitment to a rules-based framework, intending to uphold a free and open Indo-Pacific region. The statement described the tribunal’s decision made in The Hague as a “significant milestone,” asserting it as “final, legally binding, and definitive.” It contended that there is no legal foundation for China’s extensive maritime claims, which include assertions based on historical entitlements.

China Asserts Sovereignty and Legality

In response to the coalition’s statement, China’s Foreign Ministry emphasised that the nation’s sovereignty and related rights over the South China Sea have been established through historical claims and are firmly supported by legal principles. The ministry’s remarks pointed out that “China’s activities in the South China Sea are fully legitimate, lawful and beyond reproach.” It maintained that its rights in the region cannot be dismissed by the so-called “arbitral tribunal.”

Furthermore, the ministry alleged that the tribunal had overstepped its authority when it issued the “award,” labelling it as an act of jurisdictional abuse. The statement declared that the “award” is thus “illegal, null and void,” and asserted that China neither acknowledges nor accepts it, reinforcing its opposition to any claims or actions deriving from the ruling.

The ruling, delivered by a five-judge tribunal appointed by the Permanent Court of Arbitration in The Hague, arose from a petition lodged by the Philippines in 2016. The tribunal dismissed China’s claims to historic rights over resources within the marine areas outlined by the “nine-dash line.” It also found that the claims contradict the exclusive economic zones established under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea.

Further Responses from China

The 14-nation coalition’s statement expressed strong opposition to the use of coastguard, military, and maritime militia forces to harass or intimidate the lawful operations of other states, highlighting concerns about regional peace and security. In light of the joint statement, China’s Foreign Ministry further expressed discontent over Japan’s characterization as a “legitimate stakeholder” in the South China Sea issues. China emphasised that Japan does not hold any position in this context and thus lacks the authority to evaluate China’s territorial sovereignty and maritime rights in the region.

This exchange of statements exemplifies the ongoing tensions over the South China Sea, with the 14 nations reaffirming their support for the 2016 ruling and China reiterating its rejection of the tribunal’s decision and any claims stemming from it. The complex geopolitical dynamics surrounding this issue continue to provoke strong reactions from both sides.

The situation remains a focal point of international relations in the region, as nations navigate their respective positions concerning maritime rights and territorial disputes.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share