Amjad Ayub Mirza, a political activist, has expressed severe criticism of Pakistan’s management of the unrest in Pakistan-occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoJK). He has alleged significant human rights violations and political manipulation occurring within the region, stating that the circumstances have culminated in the violent suppression of peaceful protests.

According to Mirza, the current wave of demonstrations was sparked by calls to abolish twelve reserved seats for refugees in the PoJK Legislative Assembly. He argues that these seats are predominantly occupied by refugees living in various parts of Pakistan, who possess minimal connection to the political dynamics of PoJK.

Mirza claims that these seats serve as a tool for Pakistan’s military establishment, aimed at swaying electoral outcomes in favour of their interests. His allegations suggest that the political structure in PoJK is heavily influenced by external actors.

Escalation of Protests and Security Response

Protests intensified following the announcement of general elections scheduled for July 27, coinciding with a lack of response to the demonstrators’ demands. The unrest culminated in a region-wide strike, which took place on June 9 and reportedly attracted large crowds throughout PoJK.

In the aftermath of the protests, security forces have been deployed extensively across the region. Mirza has described this military presence as an “invasion,” alleging that security personnel have resorted to opening fire on unarmed protesters. He claims that more than two hundred individuals, including children, have lost their lives amid these confrontations.

In addition to fatalities, Mirza has accused authorities of executing raids, making arbitrary arrests, and looting properties during operations in multiple towns across PoJK. These actions, according to him, reflect a broader pattern of systemic repression.

Concerns Over Civil Rights and Societal Impact

Mirza has further condemned the reported prohibition on the Jammu Kashmir Joint Awami Action Committee (JAAC), a well-known civil society movement participating in the protests. He posits that this suppression illustrates a preference for repression over dialogue, labelling PoJK as a “colony” instead of a self-governing entity.

He has highlighted significant grievances, asserting that PoJK suffers from economic exploitation and restrictions on individual freedoms. Mirza criticises legal stipulations that compel candidates for public office and government positions to publicly endorse Pakistan’s stance on PoJK, viewing this requirement as an infringement on democratic rights.

According to Mirza, the pervasive shutdowns across PoJK signify escalating public discontent with Pakistan’s policies in the region. He asserts that there is a notable shift in public sentiment towards demands for self-determination, as well as resistance against the control imposed by the Pakistani state.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share