The Supreme Court of India has mandated that the Director General of Police (DGP) of West Bengal Peeyush Pandey submit a personal affidavit regarding allegations made against police officers involved in Special Intensive Revision (SIR) duties. This ruling comes amid claims of threats and violence faced by the officers during their assignments.
The Supreme Court on Monday, February 9 heard the pleas challenging the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls being undertaken in the state of West Bengal. A bench comprising Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, Justice Joymalya Bagchi and Justice NV Anjaria heard the matter.
Supreme court emphasized the need for accountability
In a recent decision, the apex court emphasized the need for accountability by directing the DGP to respond to a show-cause notice issued concerning the actions of police officers during the SIR process. The court’s order highlights the significance of maintaining electoral integrity and the safety of officials assigned to sensitive roles.
The timing of this ruling is crucial, as it has extended the deadline for compliance, providing the DGP with additional time to prepare the necessary documents and responses. This decision aligns with the court’s ongoing scrutiny of electoral practices in the state, aiming to ensure fair conduct during elections.
The allegations, which have emerged from the Election Commission’s affidavit, either highlight or contradict the existing situation on the ground, underscoring the challenges faced by law enforcement in maintaining order during critical electoral events. The Supreme Court’s involvement reflects its commitment to overseeing the administration of justice in such matters.
This legal development could have broader implications for the state’s administration, particularly in how authorities respond to claims of intimidation and violence. As the legal proceedings unfold, the focus remains on ensuring that the electoral process in West Bengal is conducted without coercion or hindrance.