A Delhi court has acquitted Krishan Godara, accused of stabbing his cousin Sanjeev Godara in 2019, due to insufficient evidence. The case was presided over by Principal District and Sessions Judge Vijay Kumar Dahiya. The court’s ruling centred on the lack of blood stains, the absence of the alleged weapon, and medical evidence that contradicted the victim’s account of the incident.

The incident reportedly occurred in Nangloi in October 2019, when Krishan allegedly confronted Sanjeev while under the influence of alcohol. Prosecutors claimed he accused Sanjeev of causing his father’s imprisonment before allegedly attacking him with an ice poker. The incident was said to have transpired as Sanjeev was carrying his one-year-old niece.

The court indicated that the prosecution’s case relied heavily on the testimony of family members, with no independent witnesses coming forward, despite the location being populated with shops and residents. This lack of corroborative evidence raised significant doubts about the prosecution’s claims.

Evidence Reviewed by the Court

The court highlighted the absence of crucial evidence such as blood stains on the clothing of the complainant’s family members, who claimed to have carried Sanjeev to the hospital after the attack. The court pointed out that the absence of blood evidence undermined the prosecution’s narrative.

Moreover, investigators did not gather any blood-stained soil from the crime scene, nor did they obtain CCTV footage that could have provided clarity on the events. The failure to recover the alleged ice poker used in the attack further weakened the prosecution’s case.

The judge also noted discrepancies between the victim’s account of the stabbing and the medical records. These records described the injuries as superficial and classified them as “simple” in nature, contradicting the claim that the weapon had penetrated deep into Sanjeev’s body.

Outcome and Court’s Conclusion

In delivering its verdict, the court asserted that the prosecution had not managed to demonstrate the guilt of the accused beyond reasonable doubt. Given the lack of substantive evidence, the judge extended the benefit of the doubt to Krishan Godara, leading to his acquittal.

The court’s decision included the discharge of Krishan Godara’s bail and surety bonds, officially concluding the case. The court’s rationale centred on the insufficient proof presented during the trial and the inconsistencies in witness testimonies and medical reports.

The ruling emphasises the judicial responsibility to ensure that charges are substantiated by credible evidence, especially in serious cases such as attempted murder. This case serves as a reminder of the importance of thorough investigation and collection of pertinent forensic evidence in criminal proceedings.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share