The Supreme Court has declined to entertain a public interest litigation challenging the Tamil Nadu Assembly Speaker’s decision to drop disqualification proceedings against 21 AIADMK MLAs. This ruling was delivered on Friday, and the court indicated it would not intervene in the previous decision made by the Madras High Court.

The high court had dismissed the petition filed by P V Selvakumar, which had sought action against the MLAs following their votes in favour of the ruling TVK government during a confidence vote. A bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant reviewed the case and expressed reservations about Selvakumar’s standing to pursue the issue. The Chief Justice noted that Selvakumar was neither a sitting legislator nor an authorised representative entitled to advocate for disqualification proceedings against the MLAs.

Court Questions the Standing of the Petitioner

During the hearing, Advocate Nina Nariman, representing Selvakumar, asserted that he was a concerned voter and a member of the AIADMK party. Justice Joymalya Bagchi responded by stating that the integrity of proceedings under the 10th Schedule of the Indian Constitution could only be upkept through actions initiated by members of the legislative assembly.

Justice Bagchi acknowledged the importance of maintaining constitutional mandates but insisted on the necessity of understanding how a democratic system functions. Furthermore, the bench remarked that the AIADMK’s leadership seemed to have overlooked the MLAs’ actions, implying that grievances should originate from the party or its designated representatives.

Selvakumar’s arguments highlighted that the matter extended beyond the party whip to encompass communications directed to the Speaker. The court, however, raised concerns over whether a third party could rightfully challenge a decision after the AIADMK had opted to forgive the transgressions of its legislators.

Background of the Disqualification Proceedings

The disqualification proceedings stemmed from an incident on May 13, when 25 AIADMK MLAs cast their votes in support of the TVK government led by Chief Minister C Joseph Vijay, directly contradicting the party directive instructing them to oppose the government. Following this, the Speaker initiated disqualification proceedings against the MLAs the next day under the provisions of the 10th Schedule of the Constitution.

The AIADMK leadership subsequently requested the withdrawal of disqualification proceedings against 21 of these MLAs, a request which the Speaker approved. Meanwhile, four other legislators chose to resign from the party. Selvakumar’s challenge to this decision centres on the argument that the Speaker cannot simply dismiss the proceedings based on a change in the party’s position.

It emphasises that defying a party whip entails constitutional ramifications. The Madras High Court ultimately dismissed Selvakumar’s petition, ruling that he lacked the authority to question the Speaker’s decision, while also asserting that the party had effectively condoned the actions of the MLAs within the statutory timeframe.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share