The Supreme Court has expressed its dissatisfaction with the Kerala government’s failure to adhere to its order regarding the custody of Raman, identified as the tallest elephant in the state. During a hearing on Friday, the bench, led by Justices Dipankar Datta and Sheel Nagu, urged the state to provide the latest medical report for Raman.

It was indicated that the elephant remained with his keeper due to being in musth, a condition characterised by heightened testosterone levels in male elephants, which allegedly prevented him from being relocated. The justices noted that the Kerala authorities had neglected to follow earlier instructions regarding the elephant’s welfare and questioned whether proper health monitoring was being conducted. The court mandated the government to submit a recent veterinary report analyzing Raman’s condition.

Judges Cited Lack of Emotional Care

In the course of the proceedings, the caretaker’s representatives argued that Raman received adequate love and care. However, Justice Datta responded sternly, indicating that emotional care was insufficient in the face of legal obligations. He remarked on the need for compliance rather than merely expressing affection for the elephant, highlighting the seriousness of the situation.

The ongoing case stems from a contempt petition filed by Jayakrishna Menon, asserting that Raman belonged to the Mata Amritanandamayi Mutt but was temporarily entrusted to caretaker Krishnankutty. The Supreme Court had previously ordered the state government on June 9, 2026, to take custody of Raman and relocate him to a suitable rehabilitation centre, emphasising the importance of the welfare of animals that cannot voice their needs.

The court had acknowledged allegations of commercial exploitation against Raman, who had reportedly been utilised in several ceremonial processions, violating a prior restraint order. In their comments, the judges reflected on the neglect and exploitation the elephant had faced, stating their wish not to overlook such defiance against the law. They emphasised that overlooking the plight of such animals compromises their judicial responsibilities.

In a previous ruling, Krishnankutty was found in contempt for disregarding an undertaking made before the court, receiving a fine of Rs 2,000. The court clarified that its order for custody was temporary and also stated that the state could provide care for Raman at its own expense, under the provisions of the Wildlife (Protection) Act, 1972.

Current Status and Future Directions

The hearing on Friday primarily revolved around whether the Kerala government had fulfilled the court’s earlier directives and the current state of Raman’s health. The court raised concerns regarding the validity of the last medical report, expressed doubts about the monitoring of Raman’s condition since June 24, and instructed the state to ensure compliance with the previous court orders in future hearings.

Legal counsel for the state was interrogated about the measures taken to ensure the elephant’s well-being, indicating a clear expectation for immediate action. The court is set to reconvene at a later date, where it is anticipated that further discussions regarding Raman’s custody and health will take place.

The proceedings illustrate a critical juncture in the ongoing debate surrounding animal rights and the responsibilities of caretakers and authorities. The Supreme Court has reiterated its commitment to protecting voiceless animals and ensuring that any commercial exploitation ceases, enforcing strict compliance to safeguard their welfare.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share