The Delhi High Court on Monday dismissed a petition seeking a Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) inquiry into the large amount of cash discovered at the residence of former High Court judge Yashwant Varma. Justice Amit Bansal expressed scepticism regarding the legitimacy of the petitioner’s claim and remarked on the suitability of alternative legal recourse available. The petitioner, advocate Ghanshyam Upadhyay, was advised to pursue his case through the Delhi Police or a relevant magistrate.

Justice Bansal’s comments highlighted the court’s view that the petition appeared to be an unnecessary pursuit. He stated, “This is a wild witch hunt. You have nothing better to do?” This response emphasised the need for seriousness in legal proceedings and the court’s inclination to discourage frivolous legal actions.

Arguments Presented by the Petitioner

During the proceedings, Upadhyay represented himself and argued that the situation warranted an investigation due to its extraordinary nature. He insisted that standard judicial avenues available to a magistrate were inadequate for addressing the complexities of this case. “A magistrate cannot direct the CBI or SIT enquiry,” he asserted, implying that the gravity of the allegations necessitated a higher level of scrutiny.

Furthermore, Upadhyay contended that the criminal justice system permits any individual to initiate legal proceedings. He disputed the notion that there were restrictions against starting an inquiry into the matter, underscoring his belief in the necessity for a robust investigation.

Responding to Upadhyay’s arguments, Premtosh Kumar Mishra, the Central Government Standing Counsel, pointed out that the petitioner had made an identical appeal to the Supreme Court, which was subsequently dismissed. This instance strengthened the argument against the merit of the current petition, as it seemingly mirrored previous attempts to seek the same remedy.

Context of the Cash Discovery

The controversy surrounding Yashwant Varma began following a fire incident at his official residence in Lutyens’ Delhi in March 2025. Responding to the fire, the fire department discovered a significant quantity of cash while extinguishing the flames. This incident catalysed widespread scrutiny and prompted allegations concerning Varma’s financial dealings.

Following the cash discovery, Varma was transferred to the Allahabad High Court, which represents his original judicial posting. He subsequently faced impeachment proceedings following the fire incident and the allegations that ensued. Varma resigned from his position on April 9, 2026, amidst these proceedings.

A parliamentary committee investigated the accusations made during the impeachment process, ultimately finding substantial evidence against Varma, including the unexplained cash found at his residence and irregularities in evidence handling. However, the Lok Sabha’s removal proceedings became ineffective with Varma’s resignation, bringing an end to that particular chapter of his judicial career.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share