The Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) announced on September 1, 2026, that it is retracting its plan for a protest march in Delhi scheduled for September 5. This decision follows the Central Government’s commitment to address concerns raised by the CJP, including the withdrawal of FIRs linked to the protests on July 20 at Jantar Mantar. Saurav Das, spokesperson for the CJP, communicated this development to a Supreme Court bench led by Chief Justice of India (CJI) Surya Kant.

During the hearing, Das remarked that the CJP considered it fitting to cancel the protest march in light of the government’s positive response, indicating a willingness to engage constructively. He noted that the assurances conveyed at this session secured confidence in the judicial process. CJI Surya Kant responded positively, suggesting that cooperative gestures from both parties could pave the way for resolution.

Government Assurances During SC Hearing

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta outlined three key assurances made by the Central Government at a meeting with protest leaders. First, he stated that FIRs filed against demonstrators for events occurring between July 20 and July 25 would not be pursued. Second, he asserted that no new FIRs would be lodged regarding those incidents. Lastly, he addressed the issue of compensation for the families of individuals who tragically died by suicide during the protest phase.

Mehta conveyed to the court that the government’s stance remains firm on fulfilling these commitments, thus alleviating some concerns from the CJP. His statements underscored the government’s dedication to finding a resolution while maintaining lawful proceedings. He dismissed doubts about the government’s intentions and highlighted collaboration with the CJP as a vital step moving forward.

However, the Centre did present a specific application from the Delhi Police seeking permission to initiate a fresh FIR against 2,873 individuals allegedly with serious criminal backgrounds. This request was contingent on evidence confirming their involvement in violent actions or property destruction during the protests. Solicitor General Mehta clarified that this request does not extend to all protesters but pertains exclusively to the identified individuals.

Compensation Modalities and Timeframe Requested

In addressing the matter of compensation for the families affected by suicides, the Centre requested a time frame of three months to establish the payment mechanisms. Solicitor General Mehta assured the court of the government’s commitment while acknowledging that configuring the modalities would necessitate consultations with various states and stakeholders.

The Supreme Court was informed that verifying claims would be crucial, ensuring a structured approach to the compensation process. Mehta emphasised the importance of thorough planning before any disbursement could commence, promoting transparency and justice for the affected families. The court took note of the government’s request to document these assurances and grant an appropriate period for finalising the compensation process.

The CJP’s legal representatives confirmed that the three-month duration sought is to complete the payment procedures. As the court acknowledged the requests made by the government, it reiterated the need for a systematic approach to dealing with the impacts of the protests, particularly focusing on the sensitivity surrounding the compensation issue.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share