Rahul Gandhi, the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha and a member of Congress, has raised issues regarding the protracted delay in the registration of a First Information Report (FIR) relating to the pellet gun incident involving Sahil Lochav. He claimed that this situation reflects an obstruction to justice allegedly stemming from higher authorities.

Gandhi remarked on the urgent need for justice, particularly noting the gravity of Lochav’s injuries, which include pellets embedded in his eye and close to his heart. “This marks the initial step toward justice,” Gandhi stated after the FIR was eventually filed. He expressed his concerns about the implications of delayed justice for ordinary citizens.

Having arrived at the Parliament Street Police Station at approximately 11:00 am or 11:30 am, Gandhi and his supporters reportedly remained there for nearly eight hours before the FIR was filed. “It is now nearly a quarter to seven, and only now has the FIR been filed,” he noted, underscoring the lack of prompt action by authorities.

Allegations of Authority Interference

Gandhi has alleged that the holdup in registering the FIR was due to the need for approval from senior officials, including the Home Secretary and Amit Shah. He accused these authorities of placing “brakes on justice,” which suggests that lower-level police officers were prepared to process the FIR but were hindered by higher command.

The Delhi Police confirmed on August 21 that the FIR had been registered regarding the use of pellet guns during protests that occurred on July 20 in the capital. The FIR was filed under relevant sections of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS), which addresses injuries inflicted through dangerous means.

During a sit-in at the police station, Gandhi reiterated the serious nature of Lochav’s condition and the potential consequences of the incident. He articulated that the threat to justice prevents countless victims from accessing legal recourse. His comments reflect broader concerns regarding systemic failures in law enforcement, especially in urban settings.

Reactions from Government Officials

In response to Gandhi’s protest, Union Health Minister JP Nadda accused him of engaging in what he termed “cheap, attention-seeking politics.” Nadda highlighted that the Supreme Court has already acknowledged the events of July 20, forming a high-powered committee to investigate the matters related to police conduct during the protests.

Nadda questioned why Gandhi opted to hold a demonstration at the police station when a Supreme Court-appointed committee is investigating the same issues. He suggested that the protest serves to keep Gandhi in the public eye rather than to champion genuine causes.

The Supreme Court recently established a five-member High-Powered Expert Committee, led by retired Justice R Subhash Reddy, to delve into various allegations surrounding police actions and violence during the protests. The committee is tasked with reviewing claims of excessive force by police and misconduct towards protestors.

Furthermore, Congress leader Jairam Ramesh clarified that the party’s focus remains on the registration of the FIR alone, bridging the demands for accountability and Lochav’s right to seek justice. This emphasis on constitutional rights aligns with broader calls for reform within law enforcement practices.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share