The Supreme Court on Friday expressed strong disapproval of what it described as repeated interference by the Himachal Pradesh High Court in decisions of the state government, observing that such actions appeared to prevent the elected administration from functioning effectively.

A bench led by Chief Justice Surya Kant, along with Justice Joymalya Bagchi, cautioned that it would take a serious view of similar interventions in the future. Despite the criticism, the court upheld the High Court’s rejection of the state government’s request to postpone local body elections on the grounds of an ongoing delimitation exercise.

Delimitation Not A Ground To Delay Polls

The Supreme Court made it clear that the pendency of delimitation cannot justify postponing elections. It noted that the Constitution mandates timely polls for urban local bodies, municipalities and nagar panchayats.

The bench observed that the High Court’s insistence on holding elections after the expiry of the existing bodies’ tenure was consistent with constitutional provisions and therefore did not warrant interference.

Himachal Pradesh has a large network of local institutions, including about 3,500 gram panchayats, 90 panchayat samitis, 11 zila parishads and 71 urban local bodies, most of which are due for elections this year.

Deadline Extended Due To Logistical Challenges

Taking into account practical difficulties such as winter conditions and accessibility issues in remote areas, the Supreme Court extended the deadline set by the High Court. The earlier April 30 timeline for completing the elections has now been pushed to May 31.

The court directed that all preparatory work must be completed by March 31 instead of February 28. Elections are to be conducted within eight weeks thereafter, with the court emphasising that no further extension requests will be entertained.

During the hearing, senior advocate Maninder Singh argued that the High Court’s earlier deadlines had considered the upcoming nationwide Census work scheduled to begin in May. Representing the state government, senior advocate V Giri urged the court to factor in logistical constraints while setting the election schedule.

Constitutional Mandate Reaffirmed

In its order, the Supreme Court reiterated that democratic processes at the grassroots level cannot be delayed without compelling reasons. The bench emphasised that regular elections to local bodies are a constitutional requirement and form a crucial part of decentralised governance.

At the same time, the court’s remarks about judicial overreach signal concern over the balance between judicial scrutiny and executive functioning. Observers say the ruling reinforces both the autonomy of elected governments and the constitutional obligation to conduct timely elections, setting a clear precedent for similar disputes in other states.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share