The Madras High Court’s Madurai Bench observed that just as there can be a housewife, there can also be a house husband while resolving a matrimonial dispute involving a couple of doctors. This stance was articulated during the court’s proceedings which aimed at promoting equitable division of domestic tasks to bolster familial structures.

Background of the Case

The matrimonial dispute arose between a doctor couple from Tiruvannamalai, who filed separate appeals against decisions made by the Family Court in Theni. The couple, both employed at Sri Venkateshwara Medical College Hospital in Puducherry, married in 2011 and welcomed their first child in 2012. Following the birth, the wife lived with her parents to care for the child, while the husband continued his studies in cardiology.

Years later, in 2016, the couple had their second child. They reunited during the post-COVID-19 period in 2020 but began to experience significant disagreements. In seeking resolution, the wife filed for restitution of conjugal rights, whereas the husband pursued a divorce. Both petitions were dismissed, prompting the couple to approach the High Court for further relief through separate appeals.

The judges on the Division Bench, Justices GR Swaminathan and MD Sumathi, highlighted the cultural importance of the family as a basic social unit. They underscored the necessity for equal acknowledgment of both income-earning and household-maintaining responsibilities.

Insights on Gender Roles in Marriage

During the hearings, the court noted that in contemporary society, some women view marriage as a hindrance to their career progression, contributing to a rising number of unmarried women. The judges suggested that if men actively participated in domestic roles traditionally assigned to women, it might alter this perception.

In their deliberations, the Bench asserted that if roles such as that of a ‘housewife’ exist within cultural contexts, then the concept of a ‘house-husband’ should also be embraced. They argued that this balanced distribution of roles could contribute positively to marital stability and the overall integrity of family units.

The court also referenced the term “homemaker” as gender-neutral, reinforcing that the economic value of the responsibilities undertaken by a wife in the household is recognised by the Supreme Court.

Settlement and Divorce Order

Diverging into the specifics of the case, the parties reached a financial arrangement that would facilitate their separation. The husband consented to pay ₹2.5 crore to the wife, considering the welfare of their children, a decision she accepted. This agreement ultimately led to the dissolution of the marriage.

In accordance with the mutual consent, the High Court granted the divorce, concluding the appeals temporarily. The court mandated the husband to transfer ₹1.5 crore to the wife within three months after he receives a copy of the court order, the funds to be deposited directly into her bank account.

Moreover, the Bench instituted that ₹50 lakh each must be deposited in the names of their two children within one year, ensuring their financial security post-divorce.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share