The Supreme Court of India has directed the Ministry of Environment and other involved parties to propose names of experts for a committee that will define the Aravali hills and associated ranges. This decision reinforces the temporary ban on mining activities in the region, which will remain in place until further assessments are conducted. The directive was issued during a hearing on Thursday, where a bench led by Chief Justice of India Surya Kant, alongside Justices Joymalya Bagchi and Vipul M Pancholi, highlighted the necessity of a clear and lawful mining framework for the Aravali region.

Previous Orders on Mining Status

On December 29, the court addressed widespread concerns regarding the previous definition of the Aravali hills, and consequently suspended its order from November 20, which had accepted a uniform definition for these geographical features. This suspension effectively halted all mining operations, raising questions regarding the balance between environmental protection and licensed commercial activities in the area. Continuing with this theme, the bench reiterated its focus on allowing only lawful mining, urging that expert opinions be sought to shape future guidelines.

Expert Contributions Needed

During the proceedings, senior advocate Mukul Rohatgi, representing a mining company, asserted that the entity possessed a valid mining license and had fought for the right to operate. However, ongoing court rulings have prevented any extraction activities from proceeding. The Chief Justice communicated the court’s intent to establish a committee that would provide clear definitions regarding lawful mining practices. He expressed optimism regarding the eventual resolution of this matter, indicating a willingness to work through any challenges that arise. The court has also asked lawyer Jay Cheema to assist in these discussions, while senior advocate K Parmeswar has been appointed as amicus curiae in this case.

Actions and Timelines Set by the Court

The bench has requested that the environment ministry submit a list of proposed domain experts, including their qualifications. Counselors involved in the case are also encouraged to provide profiles of reputable individuals who can serve on this expert panel. Recognizing the situation’s urgency, the court noted that mining activities have effectively come to a standstill due to the existing legal constraints. They emphasized that the status quo must be upheld while preliminary questions related to the Aravali hills and ranges are addressed systematically.

Future Hearings and Considerations

Stakeholders have been directed to present written responses by March 10, following input from the amicus curiae regarding the definitions in question. The bench intends to finalize the expert panel and outline specific issues for deliberation at the next scheduled hearing. Prior comments made by the court highlighted concerns that previous assessments may not have fully addressed critical components necessary for environmental protection. There is a consensus among environmental groups about the potential risks associated with ambiguous definitions and regulatory actions that could compromise the ecological stability of the Aravali region.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share