Members of Parliament typically unite across party affiliations when discussing salary and benefits. However, two current MPs from the Lok Sabha have opted to forgo their salaries entirely, as revealed in a recent Right to Information response. One MP is affiliated with the Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) while the other represents the Indian National Congress. These two MPs, Naveen Jindal from Kurukshetra and Dr. Bimol Akoijam Angomcha from Inner Manipur, represent constituencies that are approximately 2,575 kilometers apart.

Further demonstrating their commitment to this decision, Jindal has opted out of officially sanctioned perks and allowances as well. This choice reflects a stark contrast to the usual trends among parliamentarians, who frequently advocate for salary increases and enhanced benefits.

Decision Stands Out Amid Salary and Benefit Debates

The RTI reply, which addressed a query posed to the Lok Sabha Secretariat, specifies that Naveen Jindal and Dr. Bimol Akoijam Angomcha are the only members choosing not to receive remuneration. In terms of their financial backgrounds, both MPs present an interesting disparity. Jindal has declared assets totaling approximately Rs 1,241 crore, making him one of the wealthiest individuals serving in the 18th Lok Sabha. In contrast, Dr. Akoijam Angomcha reports assets amounting to around Rs 97 lakh.

Financial Backgrounds Show Sharp Contrast

While Jindal ranks among the top members financially, he is not the wealthiest MP in the Lok Sabha. That title belongs to Chandra Sekhar Pemmasani, a member of the Telugu Desam Party from Guntur, with declared assets exceeding Rs 5,705 crore. Following him is another BJP member, Konda Vishweshwar Reddy, with assets surpassing Rs 4,568 crore.

Salary Status of Other MPs

Currently, 481 out of 543 sitting Lok Sabha members are recorded as drawing salaries, while the RTI response does not address the status of the remaining MPs. The Lok Sabha has a total of 543 seats, although two are presently unoccupied. This situation raises questions about the financial decisions of the remaining members and the overall compensation landscape within the Parliament.

A Different Approach to Parliamentary Responsibility

The decision made by Jindal and Akoijam Angomcha may serve as a noteworthy example within the Lok Sabha, highlighting a divergence from the more common practice of accepting salaries and allowances among parliamentarians. As the lower house continues to operate with a multitude of financial profiles and perspectives, the choices made by these two MPs add another layer to the ongoing dialogue regarding parliamentary compensation and responsibility.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share