A recent social media post by a lead developer has gone viral after he shared an unusual exchange with a job candidate. The developer explained that he had personally shortlisted and scheduled the candidate’s interview, but could not conduct the first round due to an accident. His company’s HR team stepped in to handle the initial process. When the employer later asked HR to check the candidate’s availability for his round, an unexpected response arrived from the applicant.

The developer’s viral post read: “I’m a Lead Developer in a remote company. I personally selected and scheduled an interview with this person last week, but I met with an accident at the same time. So the first round was taken by HR, and I hadn’t scheduled my round yet. I asked HR to check the candidate’s availability. Now, see the reply he gave.”

The candidate, in a WhatsApp message, wrote that he wished to maintain professionalism but believed he was far superior in skills. His exact words suggested that he considered himself “1000 times a better developer” than the lead developer himself. He further claimed his education from a top institute in India was proof enough, pointing to exam cut-offs for validation.

The applicant ended his message firmly by stating: “Sir, I think I should maintain some professionalism, but unfortunately, I believe I am 1000 times a better developer than Mr Shah. I am educated from one of the top institutes in India—no bluffs, just see the cutoffs. I will not be moving forward with your company anymore.”

The lead developer shared the episode online under the title, “Dekhlo guys Gen Z attitude,” which was later reshared on Reddit by users under trending discussions.

Social Media Reactions

The strong wording from the candidate quickly attracted attention, sparking a wave of comments on work ethics and professionalism in today’s job market. One user mocked the exaggerated claim, writing that someone without experience in real-world projects rating themselves “1000x better” than an industry lead was laughable. Another stressed that employers also valued interpersonal qualities like humility and likeability, not just technical knowledge.

Some commentators suggested that the employer should simply “reject and move on,” saying that this behaviour itself made the candidate unsuitable for teamwork. One popular comment read, “Someone who hasn’t worked on real world projects yet feels he’s 1000x better than a lead because his college had a high cut off? Cute lol.”

Others pointed out that such arrogance is not a Gen Z trait alone. “Why blame entire generation for one rejection? People from all generations have attitude problem, this isn’t a genz issue,” said one user, defending younger employees against broad stereotypes.

Debate on professionalism

The incident has reignited discussions on confidence versus arrogance in job interviews. Recruiters often look for a balance—assertiveness without condescension. Experts note that candidates who show respect to HR staff and technical leaders generally leave better impressions than those who rely solely on academic credentials or self-praise.

In this situation, while the employer’s accident delayed the technical evaluation, it was the applicant’s sharp words and refusal to continue that stole public attention. Commentators also highlighted that the younger workforce often views employment differently, with less fear of rejecting opportunities and greater willingness to express dissatisfaction.

For many observers, the episode is a reminder that career success requires not just skill, but also the ability to work within teams with mutual respect. The “1000x better” claim, though dramatic, has become a case study in how confidence, when unchecked, can overshadow competence.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share