A trademark battle between McPatel Foods Pvt Ltd, an Ahmedabad-based company, and McDonald’s has grabbed the spotlight among food lovers and legal experts. The crux of the dispute is the use of the prefix “Mc” in the brand name, with McDonald’s claiming exclusive rights while McPatel asserts it is a generic term.

Background of the Dispute

McPatel Foods, known locally for its popular French fries brand ‘Ohh! Potato’, has recently filed a legal suit against McDonald’s. The dispute centres on McDonald’s claim that the prefix “Mc” is exclusively associated with their brand. McDonald’s, with its worldwide reputation, issued legal threats to McPatel to stop using “Mc” in its trade name, asserting that it forms a core part of their global identity.

McPatel has pushed back firmly, arguing that the prefix “Mc” is a generic term with deep cultural and linguistic roots. The company states that its name honours the Patel community, a significant population group in India, and that “Mc” means “son of” in many contexts, including theirs.

Legal Journey

Prior to the suit, McDonald’s initiated mediation proceedings in the Delhi High Court to resolve the issue. These efforts ended without an agreement as McDonald’s insisted McPatel cease using the “Mc” prefix. Consequently, McPatel approached the Ahmedabad rural court under Section 142 of the Trademark Act to seek an injunction against McDonald’s alleged “groundless threats”.

The court has already issued a notice to McDonald’s, with the next hearing scheduled for late July. The case is shaping up to be a significant legal test of trademark rights against cultural and regional identity claims.

McPatel’s senior counsel explains that the prefix “Mc” is generic and cannot be monopolised by a single multinational entity. They contend that the use of “Mc” in their brand is rooted in linguistic tradition, reflecting “son of Patel” and honouring the community. This argument highlights that not all “Mc” branded names should be treated as infringements of McDonald’s brand.

The Wider Context

Such trademark disputes are not rare. Global brands like McDonald’s often go to great lengths to protect their identities, reflected in product names such as McBurger and McNuggets. However, this case brings into focus the delicate balance between protecting businesses’ rights and respecting the cultural, linguistic diversity that shapes Indian branding. The outcome could have far-reaching effects on how local companies can use familiar or shared prefixes in their branding.

Public and Industry Reaction

The case has generated intense interest beyond legal circles. Many people are supporting the local business, viewing McPatel as the underdog challenging a deep-pocketed multinational. The dispute also sparks a larger debate about how power is distributed between Indian entrepreneurs and global corporations in the country’s growing food and retail landscape.

While McDonald’s remains a pioneer in fast food, adapting its global menu for Indian tastes, local brands like McPatel strive to carve out their own space by blending cultural heritage with modern business models.

The McPatel versus McDonald’s trademark dispute represents more than just a name; it embodies identity, culture, and the rights of local businesses against vast multinational enterprises. The forthcoming court decisions will be closely watched by industries and consumers alike, hoping for a resolution that respects legal principles as well as cultural significance.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share