The Supreme Court has mandated the Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) to initiate a Preliminary Enquiry (PE) regarding the DLF Primus project located in Gurugram. This directive follows allegations that the project’s construction did not adhere to the original plans presented to homebuyers. The bench, comprised of Justice Ahsanuddin Amanullah and Justice R. Mahadevan, emphasised that housing developments must correspond with the information provided to potential buyers, particularly as depicted in marketing brochures.

During the proceedings, the Court specifically noted discrepancies regarding a road that was promised in the project materials. The mentioned 24-metre-wide roadway appears to be absent as per the current state of the site compared to the original proposal.

To investigate these claims, the Court has assigned CBI officer Saurabh Gupta, IPS, with the task of determining whether alterations in the road’s specifications have occurred. Gupta submitted a report on August 3, 2026, which indicated that the anticipated road does not exist as per the initial plans.

Significant Deviations Identified by CBI

Gupta’s findings revealed that of the 147-metre stretch planned for the roadway, approximately 52 metres has been repurposed into a green patch, while another segment is presently being utilised for parking by residents. This suggests that roughly 100 metres, or nearly two-thirds of the expected roadway, is not being constructed as indicated in the original brochure.

The Court expressed concern over the absence of corrective measures taken to rectify these deviations, despite providing several opportunities for compliance. The judges highlighted that consistent failures to address these issues reflect poorly on the responsible parties involved in the project.

In the same proceedings, Gupta mentioned that he has been allotted a two-month period to complete the Preliminary Enquiry report, as per a previous order dated July 21. He advocated for additional resources to accelerate the enquiry process.

Court Critiques Haryana Government’s Efforts

The Supreme Court has urged the Director of the CBI to appoint two more inspectors to assist Gupta in completing the inquiry promptly. Furthermore, the Court expressed dissatisfaction with the Haryana government’s handling of the matter, particularly concerning the acquisition of a significant 100-metre land segment necessary for connecting the project road to the adjacent 60-metre sector road.

Concerns were raised about the lack of effective measures taken by the state government to resolve existing land-related disputes, which could potentially hinder the election process for the Residents Welfare Association. The Court insisted that necessary steps must be undertaken expediently to rectify the various outstanding issues.

In warning of potential further legal action, the Court noted that it expects the entire project to conform to the representations made in the marketing materials before the next scheduled hearing. The Additional Advocate General for Haryana has been instructed to submit comprehensive responses to the affidavits filed by private parties, detailing steps being taken to ensure compliance with legal regulations.

Next Hearing Scheduled

The case is set for its next hearing on October 12 at 3 pm. The Supreme Court’s ongoing scrutiny signals a commitment to ensuring housing projects meet the standards promised to buyers, underscoring the importance of accountability in construction practices in the region.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share