Delhi High Court Pulls Up Richa Chadha Over Unverified Flight Claims, Flags Public Shaming Risks

Actor Richa Chadha has faced criticism from the Delhi High Court for her role in disseminating unverified allegations regarding an incident on a flight from Delhi to Mumbai. The court remarked that her reiteration of the claims, accompanied by the phrase “Make him famous,” had contributed to a culture of public shaming and digital vigilantism.

Incident Details and Social Media Fallout

The case stems from an incident that occurred on March 11, when a journalist accused a fellow passenger of inappropriate physical behavior during the flight. The journalist took to the social media platform X shortly after landing to share the accusation, identifying the individual and including a photograph along with his professional background. This claim quickly garnered attention online and was subsequently reported by various media outlets.

Chadha added to the discourse by reposting the allegations, resulting in her comments being cited in a defamation lawsuit initiated by the accused individual. He has denied the claims, asserting that he remained seated for the duration of the flight and fell asleep just before landing.

Court Observations and Responsibilities of Public Figures

During a hearing on March 20, Justice Vikas Mahajan indicated that Chadha’s support for the claims exceeded the boundaries of free expression. The court remarked that her amplification of the allegation, combined with the “instigatory” language, had effectively acted as “a catalyst for public shaming and digital vigilantism.”

The judge further stated that public figures bear both legal and ethical obligations to verify the accuracy of information before using their platforms to highlight serious accusations. The court expressed that endorsement of unverified allegations has the potential to inflict significant and irreparable damage to the reputation of an individual.

Implications of Digital Reporting

During proceedings, it was noted that Chadha had already removed her post. The court expressed its anticipation that she would refrain from escalating the issue going forward. Additionally, the court highlighted the manner in which the allegations were initially publicized, criticizing the journalist for making the claim known online prior to lodging a formal FIR. The court maintained that while the journalist had the right to voice concerns, sharing the accusation along with the identity and image of the accused before an investigation could cause serious violations of the accused’s rights.

The court also discussed the role of digital news platforms, including NDTV and ABP News, emphasizing that their unverified reporting of the allegations could undermine the integrity of the legal proceedings. Such practices could violate the principle of presumption of innocence and contribute to a public trial without due process.

Directions from the Court

In light of these findings, the court ordered the removal of defamatory content and prohibited the defendants from making similar allegations prior to the next hearing in the case.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share