These prohibitory measures follow a significant announcement by the Cockroach Janata Party, which is organising a major protest in neighbouring Delhi. The protest aims to demand the resignation of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar amid allegations of electoral irregularities put forward by opposition parties and various organisations.

Farming groups and youth organisations are reportedly mobilising participants from around the country, including Uttar Pradesh, to join the demonstrations. In anticipation of these activities, security checks have intensified, with additional police and security personnel, including forces from the Border Security Force, deployed at Noida’s borders with Delhi.

Details of the Prohibitory Measures

The order, issued by Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police (Law and Order) Archana Singh, aims to cover significant upcoming events, including the Navratri festival starting on October 11 and the celebrations of Dussehra and Mahanavami on October 19 and 20. It also addresses various ongoing demonstrations from different groups over a range of demands.

The directive states that the potential for anti-social elements to disturb public order cannot be discounted. Consequently, the order was issued without prior hearings, citing the urgent need for such measures in light of the current situation.

No person is permitted to organise or participate in any procession on public thoroughfares or at toll plazas, or to gather in groups of five or more in public spaces without obtaining prior consent from the relevant police authorities. Notably, while some exemptions may be granted for authorised government programmes, other specific prohibitions cover a range of activities, including provocative speeches and the unauthorised use of drones.

Prohibitions and Penalties for Violations

The order further enforces restrictions against the use of loudspeakers from 10 pm to 6 am and prohibits religious gatherings on public roads without permission. Additionally, it disallows unauthorised worship at contentious sites, carrying or displaying weapons, celebratory firings, public consumption of alcohol, and the distribution of misleading information.

Moreover, businesses must adhere to these regulations, as forced closures or disruptions to essential supplies, along with the sale or use of “Chinese” manjha, are forbidden. Similarly, within a 200-metre radius of examination centres, large gatherings, unauthorised loudspeakers, and photocopying will be restricted, while electronic devices are also banned without prior permission.

Enforcement of these prohibitions will be active until October 20, unless further modifications are made through new directives from the Uttar Pradesh government. Violators may face penalties under Section 223 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. This comprehensive order aims to establish significant restrictions across Gautam Buddh Nagar, thus addressing both the festival season and heightened protest activities effectively.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share

The post Noida Implements Section 163 Restrictions Until October 20 Amid Protests appeared first on The CSR Journal.

Reports indicated significant delays along the stretch between Sarita Vihar and the Kalindi Kunj border, turning a routine journey of 15 to 20 minutes into a frustrating ordeal of one to two hours. The situation at the Sarhaul border between Delhi and Gurugram mirrored this congestion, with long queues of vehicles forcing thousands of commuters to remain stationary for considerable stretches of time.

Impact on Daily Commuters and Traffic Management

The traffic hiccup considerably disrupted the daily routines of many commuters, especially those travelling between Delhi and adjacent cities. In addition to the existing congestion, traffic diversions related to the upcoming protest compounded the strain on roads leading into the national capital. Commuters reported frustration on social media platforms, expressing their concerns and seeking assistance from traffic police.

Traffic personnel from both Delhi and Gurugram were deployed at key intersections and border points to manage vehicle movement. Motorists were encouraged to exercise patience and consider alternative routes such as MG Road and the Kundli-Manesar-Palwal (KMP) Expressway wherever possible. The efforts aimed to alleviate some of the pressure caused by the road blockages.

With elevated security measures at the city’s borders, vehicle inspections became more rigorous, particularly at significant crossing points. Police conducted checks on buses and other vehicles, targeting groups of passengers that appeared suspicious. These measures aimed to ensure public safety ahead of the planned demonstration.

Future Traffic Management Plans by Authorities

On October 10, Mumbai Police plans to maintain order at approximately 30 vital locations in Delhi. The strategy includes implementing restrictions and diversions based on the prevailing law-and-order situation. Additional Commissioner of Police (Traffic) Dinesh Gupta has stated that no major thoroughfare would face complete closure, emphasising that traffic management decisions would be made rapidly according to real-time developments.

The police have urged the public to remain informed through Delhi Traffic Police’s social media channels for the latest updates on traffic conditions and potential diversions. Proactive communication aims to assist commuters in navigating the anticipated disruptions while ensuring proper measures are in place for the upcoming protest.

While the current traffic conditions have posed challenges for many, authorities have reiterated their commitment to managing the situation effectively as protests unfold. Commuters are reminded to monitor local reports and prepare for possible delays as engagement ramps up in the coming days.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share

The post Traffic Disruptions in Delhi-NCR as Protest Preparations Begin appeared first on The CSR Journal.

Non-Compliance and Agency Actions

Officials indicated that Ghuman purportedly claimed he had not received the summons. Consequently, as he failed to appear for questioning on Friday, CBI teams resorted to pasting the summons at his residence and also dispatched it via email, as confirmed by agency sources. The summons was issued in connection with a case that was registered on Tuesday following directives from the Punjab and Haryana High Court, emphasising the seriousness of the allegations.

The agency has asserted that Ghuman, along with his associates, allegedly sought to influence the postings of IAS and IPS officers in exchange for financial benefits. This suggests significant implications regarding the integrity of public service appointments within the state administration.

In addition to the summons, the CBI conducted searches at eight different locations across Chandigarh, Mohali, Gurdaspur, Ludhiana, Patiala, Sangrur, and Jalandhar. These searches were aimed at uncovering evidence linked to Ghuman and other accused individuals involved in the case.

Details of the Case and Allegations

In a statement from CBI spokesperson Beena Yadav, it was revealed that six individuals have been charged in this case, including Ghuman, Nitin Gohal, Jitin Gohal alias Raja, Romi Raja Mahajan, Bir Devinder, R S Nagra, and a number of unidentified public servants and private individuals. The allegations centre on corrupt practices involving the manipulation of officer postings, as well as related financial dealings.

According to the spokesperson, the First Information Report (FIR) was filed on the basis of the Punjab and Haryana High Court’s orders, which followed the receipt of a report from the Enforcement Directorate. The report raised concerns regarding potential corruption by Ghuman and his associates, particularly regarding their alleged influence in various administrative and policy-related matters.

The allegations also detail how the accused public servants reportedly accessed and provided drafts of governmental orders and policies to private individuals before official release. This indicates a troubling breach of protocol and administrative integrity, raising questions about the legitimacy of decisions affecting important governmental processes.

Broader Implications for Governance

The ongoing investigation reflects wider concerns regarding the governance and administrative practices within the state of Punjab. The allegations of corruption and the involvement of public servants in illicit activities signal a potential threat to transparency and accountability in the public sector.

As the CBI intensifies its efforts, the outcomes of this case may have significant ramifications not only for those accused but also for the political landscape in Punjab. The agency’s actions underline the commitment to addressing corruption within public offices and ensuring that justice is served.

With further developments anticipated as the investigation progresses, the focus will remain on the CBI’s findings and the resultant judicial proceedings, which may set a precedent regarding the enforcement of ethical practices within government institutions.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share

The post CBI Summons Punjab CM Aide Rajbir Ghuman in Corruption Case appeared first on The CSR Journal.

Delhi Police have denied permission citing procedural protocols, previous law-and-order incidents, and concerns over potential disruptions in security and traffic. The police have indicated plans to deploy over 20,000 security personnel across New Delhi, supplemented by multiple layers of barricades, surveillance measures, and the establishment of twelve detention centres.

Dipke voiced allegations that forces had been mobilised from regions like Jammu and Kashmir and areas affected by Naxalism to ensure the safety of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar. “He is a bureaucrat. He is not a minister. He is not the Prime Minister. He is not the President,” Dipke asserted as he invoked Article 19, which asserts the right to protest in designated areas like Jantar Mantar. He condemned the various restrictions imposed on roads, metro services, and railways, leading to his remark, “Close the country. Close the election. Close the country.”

Concerns Raised About Protest Dynamics

Ranka highlighted that the ongoing disputes regarding access to Jantar Mantar were overshadowing the essence of their protest. He articulated that citizens should have the right to express dissent peacefully and democratically, noting the current authorities’ focus on preventing protestors from accessing designated areas. He emphasised that their issues pertain to the Election Commission, which they allege is acting in favour of the ruling Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP).

His commentary included allegations against the Commission for perceived collusion with the BJP, intensified by the party’s defence of Kumar and the arrests of demonstrators in states governed by the BJP. This protest occurs amidst growing demands for Kumar’s resignation and allegations of electoral misconduct. A previous CJP event in Delhi faced chaotic turnouts, prompting police to resort to tear gas and lathicharges.

Das clarified his approach to the police was to inform them rather than to seek formal permission for the protest. He stated he submitted a letter on October 7 asserting the constitutional right to protest, which was acknowledged by the police with a stamp. However, he indicated there was no indication of whether the rally would be permitted. Moreover, he pointed out that unlike the prior protest’s preparations involving senior police officers, no such meetings were scheduled this time.

Extensive Security Preparations Underway

In anticipation of the protest, extensive security measures are being implemented beyond Jantar Mantar. Reports suggest that train services to two major railway stations in Delhi have been cancelled, while around 57 metro stations will close from 9 pm on October 9. Restrictions on internet services and ride-hailing app cabs have also emerged. Over 6,500 security personnel are being deployed within a sensitive one-and-a-half-kilometre zone near the protest site, which includes Jantar Mantar, Janpath, and the Election Commission.

The police have established at least seven layers of barricading leading to the protest location and installed over 300 CCTV cameras equipped with audio-visual capabilities. Senior officers are expected to utilise body cameras, while about 100 photographers and videographers are engaged to document the protest and the police’s responses. Union Home Secretary Govind Mohan issued a directive urging police chiefs in states and Union Territories to coordinate effectively with Delhi Police, citing intelligence insights that CJP members might attempt to enter the capital despite the ongoing restrictions.

Authorities are also conducting checks on hotels and lodgings, requiring owners to notify police about guests planning to join the protest. While police personnel are instructed to exercise maximum restraint and avoid reacting to provocations, they have communicated that unauthorised assemblies will not be tolerated, and individuals arriving to take part in the protest might be directed to designated detention centres.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share

The post Cockroach Janta Party Questions Delhi Police Over Protest Restrictions appeared first on The CSR Journal.

The PIL raises concerns over the failure of these commissions to adhere to the stipulations set forth in the Electricity Act of 2003 and a previous ruling from April 2018.

Details of the Petition

The petition, submitted through lawyer Pranav Sachdeva, claims that prolonged vacancies and the lack of qualified legal members in various commissions severely impact consumers’ ability to access lawful remedies. The NGO asserts that numerous statutory violations have occurred, with extended vacancies in key positions such as chairpersons and members across 230 SERCs in the mentioned states and Union Territories.

It was noted that several commissions, including those in West Bengal, Tamil Nadu, Andhra Pradesh, Kerala, Himachal Pradesh, Meghalaya, Manipur, Mizoram, and Nagaland, continue to lack a legally qualified individual, despite the Supreme Court’s 2018 directive. The absence of a legally qualified member is particularly concerning as the Court previously underscored the necessity of such appointments to uphold the integrity of these regulatory bodies.

In Tamil Nadu, the petition highlights that all three key positions are currently vacant. Meanwhile, in Andhra Pradesh, the roles of chairperson and technical member remain unfilled, leading to operations run by only one finance member. Additionally, in West Bengal, it was reported that the chairperson’s position exists, but the current officeholder does not possess the requisite legal qualifications.

Impact on Consumer Rights

Energy Watchdog has articulated that this failure undermines consumers’ access to justice, pointing to violations of Articles 14 and 21 of the Indian Constitution. The lack of a legally trained member hampers the ability of consumers to obtain lawful adjudication for complaints lodged under the Electricity Act. The petition argues that the situation places consumers at a disadvantage, making lawful resolutions contingent upon what has been described as prolonged executive inaction.

The petition requests that the aforementioned states, along with Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh, disclose the measures being taken to ensure compliance with the Electricity Act in the constitution of their SERCs. This request underscores the urgency for these regulatory bodies to be properly staffed to meet legal requirements and facilitate effective consumer remedies.

By issuing this notice, the Supreme Court has signalled the importance of resolving the current vacancies in the state electricity regulatory commissions. The responses from the states and Union Territories are now awaited, highlighting the judiciary’s role in enforcing compliance with existing legal frameworks designed to protect consumer rights and ensure the effective functioning of essential regulatory bodies.

Next Steps for States and Union Territories

The court’s notice compels the named states and Union Territories to respond promptly to the PIL, potentially setting the stage for further legal action if satisfactory measures are not forthcoming. This development has brought significant attention to the operational challenges faced by state electricity regulatory commissions and the broader implications for consumer rights in India.

The situation is being closely monitored by various stakeholders, including consumer rights advocates and legal experts, who are interested in the outcomes of this legal scrutiny. Various states will need to take immediate steps to address the highlighted deficiencies, ensuring that their SERCs are not only operational but are also functioning in accordance with established legal standards.

As the directives from the Supreme Court unfold, it remains critical for affected consumers to be kept informed about potential remedies and improvements that may arise from this legal process. The response from the states can significantly affect the landscape of consumer justice within the electric utility sector.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share

The post Supreme Court Seeks Replies on Illegal Vacancies in State Power Panels appeared first on The CSR Journal.

Police Intervention at Vijay Chowk

As the leaders approached Vijay Chowk, they reportedly faced obstacles from law enforcement officials stationed at the location. The police intervened to halt the progress of the march, citing security measures and regulations regarding public gatherings. This action sparked further discussions regarding the right to protest and the role of security forces during political demonstrations.

Various leaders participated in the march, attempting to convey their message to the public and the media. However, the police’s decision to prevent them from advancing led to a standstill at the site. Situational tensions between the protesting leaders and law enforcement were evident as the leaders expressed their discontent with the intervention.

Followers and supporters of the INDIA bloc gathered at the scene, witnessing the interaction between police and their leaders. Many expressed solidarity with the leaders’ cause and were vocal about their right to peacefully assemble and express their views. The presence of the media further amplified the significance of the event, bringing public attention to their causes.

Political Implications of the March

The march from Parliament to Vijay Chowk is indicative of the current political dynamics within India, especially among opposition parties. The INDIA bloc, which consists of multiple political factions, aims to present a united front in the face of the ruling government. This particular event serves as a reminder of the ongoing political contestations and the strategies employed by opposition leaders to engage the electorate.

In light of the developments, analysts suggest that such marches are essential for maintaining the visibility of opposition parties in the political arena. The leaders’ choice to march signifies a commitment to democratic processes and the importance of rallying public support for their agendas. As tensions unfold, the outcome of such activities could hold significant weight in future elections and political debates.

As the day of the march saw various interactions and confrontations, the implications remain to be fully realised. The response from the authorities has raised questions about the balance between security measures and the fundamental rights of citizens to assemble peacefully. Observers will continue to monitor how these events influence the political narrative as parties prepare for upcoming challenges.

Next Steps for the INDIA Bloc

Following the events at Vijay Chowk, the leaders of the INDIA bloc have indicated plans to continue their advocacy and public engagement strategies. They aim to further discuss their policy positions and concerns with citizens across the nation. This incident could potentially act as a catalyst for more organised efforts to draw attention to the issues they represent.

Moreover, future gatherings and demonstrations may be planned to ensure that their messages reach a broader audience. The leaders have emphasised the importance of solidarity and maintaining momentum in their political initiatives. As they navigate the complexities of the current political environment, the INDIA bloc appears determined to maintain pressure on the ruling party.

In summary, the march from Parliament House to Vijay Chowk signifies a key moment in the political activities of the INDIA bloc, showcasing their intent to advocate for their causes amid legal and logistical challenges. The subsequent responses from both law enforcement and the public will shape the narrative going forward.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share

The post INDIA Bloc Leaders March From Parliament House to Vijay Chowk appeared first on The CSR Journal.

The bail was approved by Justice Pranjal Das, who set the terms at a bond of Rs 50,000 along with two sureties of the same amount. Kamar reported that the judge’s order followed a comprehensive hearing where the prosecution presented its case over a period of four to five days.

Kamar noted that the specific grounds for the bail decision were not yet disclosed. He added that Mahanta’s release from custody would occur only after the bail order is filed with the trial court and all requisite formalities are fulfilled. “The honourable judge has read the operative part. We don’t know the grounds for the grant of bail yet,” Kamar stated.

Circumstances Surrounding Zubeen Garg’s Death

Zubeen Garg tragically passed away under mysterious circumstances on September 19, 2022, while swimming in the sea off Singapore. He was in the country attending the fourth edition of the North East India Festival when the incident occurred.

According to reports, a separate investigation by the Singapore Police Force found no evidence of foul play. Additionally, a Coroner’s Court in Singapore concluded that Garg had drowned, having been severely intoxicated at the time and having declined to wear a life jacket. While these findings have been made, authorities in Assam have expressed that they will not influence the ongoing legal proceedings in the state.

Several individuals remain detained in connection with Garg’s death, including Shyamkanu Mahanta, the chief organiser of the North East India Festival, as well as Siddharth Sharma, the manager of Garg, and Shekhar Jyoti Goswami, a band member. Additionally, Garg’s cousin, Assam Police Deputy Superintendent Sandipan Garg, along with personal security officers Nandeswar Bora and Prabin Baishya are also accused in the case.

Ongoing Investigations and Legal Proceedings

An investigation into the circumstances surrounding Garg’s demise is currently underway, led by a Special Investigation Team (SIT) under the Criminal Investigation Department (CID) of the Assam Police. This initiative follows the submission of over 60 First Information Reports (FIRs) related to the case across Assam.

Despite some individuals being granted bail in an unrelated case dealing with disproportionate assets in September, they remain incarcerated due to their involvement in Garg’s death. Kamar mentioned that he would be writing to the government regarding the next steps, indicating a potential for further legal actions in this ongoing case.

As of now, Amrit Prabha Mahanta has been granted bail, but the legal ramifications regarding the investigation into Zubeen Garg’s death continue to be the subject of scrutiny and formal procedures in Assam.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share

The post Gauhati High Court Grants Bail to Amrit Prabha Mahanta in Zubeen Garg Death Case appeared first on The CSR Journal.

Context of the Case

This discussion transpired amid a plea against stringent restrictions being proposed for metro stations and the cancellation of train services entering Delhi ahead of a planned demonstration. The protest is organised by the Cockroach Janta Party (CJP) in collaboration with several student groups, who are objecting to the actions of Chief Election Commissioner Gyanesh Kumar.

Solicitor General Tushar Mehta represented the government during the hearing, indicating that the relevant authorities would consider allocating an appropriate site for future protests. Senior advocate Kapil Sibal expressed agreement with the suggestion for a new venue, underscoring the collaborative nature of the discussions during the hearing. The related bench included justices Joymalya Bagchi and V Mohana, who echoed the sentiments expressed regarding the urgent need for a protest site that meets the basic requirements for lawful assemblies.

During proceedings, the court was informed that police authorities had prohibited the CJP and the Indian Youth Congress from assembling at Jantar Mantar, which is traditionally viewed as the designated protest area. The possibility of using Ramlila Maidan, another potential protest location, was reportedly not taken into account, as per the submissions made by advocate Prashant Bhushan, who argued that demonstrators should have been permitted to gather there.

Concerns Raised by the Court

Chief Justice Surya Kant raised practical concerns regarding the logistics of protests at Jantar Mantar, particularly due to its proximity to government residences and the homes of certain Members of Parliament. He pointed out the numerous challenges protesters face in that vicinity, noting the absence of basic amenities like toilets, which further complicates the situation for those gathering to express their grievances.

Solicitor General Mehta also highlighted potential emergency issues, mentioning that ambulances may struggle to reach the site should a protester require medical attention. Such considerations reinforce the court’s position that a designated site for lawful protesting ought to have adequate facilities to ensure the safety and comfort of individuals participating in demonstrations.

After summarising their concurrence on the necessity of an alternative venue, the bench delegated the responsibility of evaluating the proposal to the competent authority. The Supreme Court has thus handed over the task of identifying a suitable protest location while emphasising the importance of ensuring that basic facilities are available to demonstrators.

Next Steps for the Government

In light of the court proceedings, Solicitor General Mehta reiterated the government’s commitment to considering the establishment of an alternative protest venue. The court’s directive serves as a pivotal moment in addressing the longstanding concerns surrounding protest locations in New Delhi. More so, this outcome is expected to facilitate peaceful demonstrations under conditions that respect the rights of individuals to assemble lawfully.

As the competent authority evaluates potential sites, it remains crucial for stakeholders involved in the protest planning to engage with government officials constructively. This collaborative effort aims to address the logistical issues that have historically hindered peaceful assemblies, thus fostering a more conducive environment for public discourse and expression in the capital.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share

The post Supreme Court Requests Centre to Explore Alternate Venue for Delhi Protests appeared first on The CSR Journal.

While addressing the issue, the Court clarified that there would be no absolute prohibition on metro services. It directed the relevant authorities to give due publicity to any decisions regarding the regulation of metro and railway services to ensure minimal disruption to the public. The Court emphasized the necessity of widespread communication of these decisions to avoid further inconveniences to commuters.

Traffic Advisory and Site for Protest Considered

The Supreme Court urged the authorities in the national capital to issue an advisory for road traffic, advising citizens who would be travelling. Solicitor General Tushar Mehta informed the Court that the Central Government would consider designating an alternative location for the protest aside from Jantar Mantar. The bench requested the government to make a well-considered decision regarding this matter.

During the proceedings, the Court reiterated that regulation of services should not equate to an outright ban. Mehta committed to requesting that authorities permit the metro services to operate in a manner consistent with public safety and order. The discussion also underscored the importance of balancing the right to protest with the rights of other citizens.

Arguments from Legal Representatives

Prominent lawyers including Kapil Sibal, Abhishek Manu Singhvi, Prashant Bhushan, and Vrinda Grover, raised objections to the extensive restrictions imposed ahead of the planned protest. They highlighted concerns such as the closure of metro stations, the cancellation of train services, and checks at Delhi’s borders, noting how these measures could prevent ordinary citizens from moving freely.

Sibal questioned the legality of such widespread restrictions throughout the national capital. Singhvi argued that the scale of preventive actions aren’t justifiable without any reported incidents. In response, Solicitor General Mehta defended the police actions, asserting that they were necessary to maintain law and order in the capital.

Discussion on Rights of Citizens

The bench of the Supreme Court expressed concerns regarding the restrictions potentially infringing on the rights of the general public. Justice Joymalya Bagchi noted the need to ensure that citizens could access essential services while still being able to exercise their right to protest. The lawyers contested that authorities are employing measures exceeding those necessary to manage the protest, citing harmful impacts on commuters’ ability to use metro services.

The Chief Justice further questioned the basis of police directives aimed at hotels and the community, with lawyers requesting clarification on the legality of the police’s extensive restrictions and signifying the lack of recorded incidents that warranted such measures. The Supreme Court reaffirmed the fundamental right of citizens to protest. It emphasises that this right must be exercised within the legal framework.

The bench hinted that restrictions could be appropriately tailored, including limiting the number of demonstrators and ensuring they remain peaceful. The Court also established that blockades on highways would be unacceptable. The justices requested that the petitioners present the actual police orders regarding the imposed restrictions.

Sibal indicated that the lawyers would return with documentation pertaining to the permissions sought for the protest and responses from the authorities involved. The Court intends to carefully review the police orders alongside the materials presented to determine the balance between the right to protest and the movement of everyday citizens in the city.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share

The post Supreme Court Modifies Ban on Delhi Metro Ahead of CJP’s Oct 10 Protest appeared first on The CSR Journal.

The post डॉक्टरों और अस्पतालों के विज्ञापन पर NMC की नई गाइडलाइन, भ्रामक प्रचार पर सख्ती appeared first on The CSR Journal.