Significance for Local Residents

Ladakh Chief Secretary Ashish Kundra highlighted that the new Bench will significantly benefit individuals in far-flung regions who often encounter challenges in reaching higher courts. These challenges include difficult terrain, harsh weather conditions, and long distances. Kundra remarked that the establishment of the High Court Bench is a pivotal milestone for the region, especially for those who have historically struggled to access judicial institutions.

During a press conference held on Saturday, Kundra explained that the initiative is particularly important for those needing to file writ petitions or seek judicial relief. Previously, residents would have to travel to Srinagar or Jammu, but with the new Bench in Leh, this journey will no longer be necessary. He described the development as an extremely positive step towards making justice more accessible.

Kundra further noted that the initiative was realised within a span of two months and was not a demand raised by Ladakh representatives during discussions with the Centre. Instead, it is a unilateral initiative by the government of India, which acknowledges the unique challenges faced by the local population due to geographical constraints.

Attendees at the Inauguration

The inauguration will also be attended by Lieutenant Governor of Ladakh Vinai Kumar Saxena, along with four other judges from the Supreme Court. The Chief Justice of the High Court of Jammu and Kashmir and Ladakh, along with other High Court judges and the Attorney General of India, will also be present at the event. This gathering underscores the significance of the occasion and the commitment to enhancing the judicial framework in the region.

Kundra pointed out that it has been over 40 years since a sitting Bench has been established in this manner for any other High Court in India. He referenced the Gauhati High Court’s Benches in Arunachal Pradesh as a comparable example, while also mentioning previous arrangements in Gwalior.

Lieutenant Governor Saxena described the establishment of the permanent Bench as a “historic step” aimed at improving the accessibility of the justice delivery system in Ladakh. He expressed gratitude to President Droupadi Murmu, Prime Minister Narendra Modi, and Union Home Minister Amit Shah for their roles in strengthening the judicial framework within the Union Territory.

Regulatory Framework for the Bench

The regulatory framework that allows for the establishment of the permanent Bench came into effect on September 5. This regulation was promulgated by President Murmu on August 27, with the implementation date subsequently announced by the Administrator in the Official Gazette. The decision to set September 5 as the effective date was made by the Lieutenant Governor.

The establishment of the permanent Bench is aimed at reducing the need for Ladakh residents to travel to Srinagar or Jammu for court proceedings, particularly for writ petitions. This initiative is expected to significantly ease the burden on local residents, making the judicial process more efficient and accessible.

Overall, the creation of the High Court Bench in Leh represents a significant advancement in the judicial landscape of Ladakh, aiming to bring justice closer to the people and address the unique challenges faced by the region’s inhabitants.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store – https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share

The post CJI Surya Kant to Open Permanent High Court Bench in Leh appeared first on The CSR Journal.

पानी सप्लाई में कमी

शहर में वर्तमान में पानी सप्लाई कैपिसिटी में करीब 100 MLD (मिलियन लीटर प्रतिदिन) की कमी है। इस कमी को पूरा करने के लिए नगर निगम गुरुग्राम (MCG) एवं निजी बिल्डर्स ट्यूबवेल का सहारा ले रहे हैं। ट्यूबवेल का उपयोग बढ़ने से भूजल स्तर में भी गिरावट आ रही है।

हाई कोर्ट ने इस गंभीर स्थिति पर चिंता जताते हुए GMDA (गुरुग्राम मेट्रोपॉलिटन डेवलपमेंट अथॉरिटी) से रिपोर्ट मांगी है। भूजल स्तर गिरने से न केवल पानी की उपलब्धता में कमी आएगी, बल्कि इससे स्वास्थ्य पर भी बुरा असर पड़ सकता है।

निवासियों के लिए चुनौतियाँ

गुरुग्राम के निवासियों को पहले ही पानी की कमी से जूझना पड़ा है। अब जब यह साफ हो गया है कि आने वाले वर्षों में पानी की मांग और बढ़ेगी, तो यह स्थिति और विकट हो सकती है। लोग अब आवश्यकतानुसार पानी के लिए संघर्ष कर रहे हैं।

समाधान की दिशा में कदम

इस गंभीर मुद्दे का समाधान खोजने के लिए कई कदम उठाने की आवश्यकता है। विशेषज्ञों के अनुसार, पानी की बर्बादी को कम करना और अधिक सतत जल संसाधन प्रबंधन की दिशा में काम करना बेहद जरूरी है। वर्तमान में पानी के लिए ट्यूबवेल पर निर्भरता को कम करना आवश्यक है।

नवीनतम रिपोर्ट की उम्मीद

हाई कोर्ट की मांग के बाद, GMDA की रिपोर्ट आने में अभी समय है, लेकिन यह निश्चित रूप से इस क्राइसिस के समाधान की दिशा में एक अहम कदम साबित होगी। सभी की नजरें अब इस रिपोर्ट पर हैं जो पानी के प्रबंधन और भूजल स्तर में सुधार के उपायों को उजागर करेगी।

गुरुग्राम के निवासियों को केवल पानी की बढ़ती मांग का सामना नहीं करना पड़ेगा, बल्कि इसे संतुलित रखने की दिशा में भी ठोस कदम उठाने होंगे। यदि समय रहते ठोस नीति बनाने की कोशिश नहीं की गई, तो भविष्य में पानी के लिए संघर्ष और बढ़ सकता है।

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share

The post Gurugram में पानी की मांग बढ़ी, High Court ने GMDA से मांगी रिपोर्ट appeared first on The CSR Journal.

राजस्थान में पहली बार ऐसा हुआ है कि हाईकोर्ट ने छुट्टी के दिन आधी रात को सुनवाई की। यह घटनाक्रम बीकानेर से जुड़े एक चुनावी मामले में हुआ, जिससे कांग्रेस पार्षदों की गिरफ्तारी पर रोक लगाई गई।

बदलाव की आहट चुनावी मौसम में

सूर्य के अस्त होते ही, जब जनता अपने घरों में थी, तब हाईकोर्ट ने रात 10 बजे से विशेष सुनवाई शुरू की। यह सुनवाई करीब दो घंटे तक चली और जस्टिस सुनील बेनीवाल ने इस मामले पर तात्कालिक निर्णय लिया।

बीकानेर नगर निगम का मामला

यह मामला बीकानेर नगर निगम के वार्ड संख्या 18 से निर्वाचित पार्षद मकसूद अहमद से संबंधित है। उन्हें पिछले दिनों एक एफआईआर के सिलसिले में नोटिस जारी किया गया था, जिससे उनकी गिरफ्तारी की आशंका बढ़ गई थी।

गिरफ्तारी की चिंता से हाईकोर्ट का दरवाजा खोला गया

कांग्रेस पार्षद के समर्थन में दाखिल याचिका के बाद, हाईकोर्ट ने अति आवश्यक समझते हुए तुरंत सुनवाई का फैसला लिया। रात करीब 11:15 बजे पार्षदों की गिरफ्तारी पर रोक लगा दी गई और उन्हें मतदान में हिस्सा लेने की अनुमति दी गई।

राजनैतिक हलचल में तेजी

राजस्थान में इन चुनावों से पहले पार्षदों की गिरफ्तारी को लेकर राजनीतिक माहौल गरमा गया था। यह आदेश चुनाव से पहले पार्षदों को एक बड़ी राहत पहुंचाने वाला साबित हुआ।

अन्य मामलों में भी सुनवाई

सिर्फ बीकानेर ही नहीं, हाईकोर्ट ने कई अन्य मामलों में भी महत्वपूर्ण आदेश जारी किए। कुचेरा नगरपालिका के पूर्व अध्यक्ष और सोनी मीठा जैसे प्रत्याशियों की गिरफ्तारी पर भी रोक लगाई गई।

पूर्व मंत्री का मामला चर्चा का विषय

प्रतापगढ़ के पूर्व मंत्री उदयलाल आंजना के खिलाफ राज-काज में बाधा डालने का मामला दर्ज होने के कारण राजनीतिक चर्चाओं में और विस्तार हुआ। यह सब घटनाक्रम आगामी चुनावों को लेकर सबकी नजरें बनी हुई हैं।

कांग्रेस का बीजेपी पर आरोप

राजस्थान प्रदेश कांग्रेस कमेटी के चीफ गोविंद सिंह डोटासरा ने बीजेपी पर निशाना साधा है। उन्होंने कहा कि इस चुनाव में बीजेपी डरी हुई है और पुलिस का दुरुपयोग कर रही है।

मतदान की महत्ता

यह सभी घटनाक्रम इस बात को दर्शाते हैं कि चुनावों में पारदर्शिता और निष्पक्षता की आवश्यकता कितनी महत्वपूर्ण है। हाईकोर्ट का यह कदम जनता के लिए एक उम्मीद की किरण बन सकता है।

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share

The post छुट्टी के दिन राजस्थान में आधी रात हाईकोर्ट की सुनवाई, कांग्रेस पार्षदों की गिरफ्तारी पर रोक appeared first on The CSR Journal.

The court also involved the Ministry of External Affairs to assist in locating Mumtaz Begum in Bangladesh and facilitating her return. The judges noted that Mumtaz Begum was denied the opportunity to contest the tribunal’s ruling in the high court, a situation that raised concerns regarding her legal rights.

Citing a Supreme Court ruling, the bench underlined that Article 21 of the Constitution applies to all individuals, irrespective of their citizenship status, protecting life and personal liberty.

Background of Mumtaz Begum’s Case

Mumtaz Begum, who resides in Nagaon, was designated as a foreigner on June 6, 2019, in a case that dates back to 2015. In Assam, foreigners tribunals assess the citizenship status of individuals suspected of not being legal citizens. Following such declarations, if individuals do not appeal to the Gauhati High Court, they face repatriation through a process involving the Ministry of External Affairs.

An estimated 100 foreigners tribunals operate within Assam’s jurisdiction. Earlier, on April 20, the High Court had nullified the tribunal’s decision on the grounds of insufficient evidential discussion and instructed Mumtaz Begum to reappear before the tribunal by May 30.

Legal Proceedings and Court Observations

The high court’s order stated that, according to an affidavit filed by the BSF, Mumtaz Begum was returned to Bangladesh on June 14, 2026, at approximately 12:10 am in the Kalaincherra area of Cachar. The bench observed that the authorities had not provided a copy of the tribunal’s ruling of May 30 or informed her family about her arrest and expulsion, thereby denying her the chance to contest the decision.

In its ruling, the court commented that Mumtaz Begum was expelled from India without her family being made aware of her detention. As a temporary measure, it instructed the Assam government to provide Rs 2 lakh to the petitioner within 60 days and also allowed for the possibility of seeking further compensation through civil court proceedings.

The court required the Ministry of External Affairs to be added as a party to the case to facilitate Mumtaz Begum’s return and enable her to pursue legal avenues against the tribunal’s ruling. Moreover, it noted potential shortcomings in the behavior of tribunal officials for their delay in providing necessary documentation.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share

The post Assam Government Ordered to Provide Compensation for Woman Deported to Bangladesh appeared first on The CSR Journal.

The complexities of judicial accountability are underscored by the challenge of addressing claims against individuals in positions of significant authority. The public and legal community are now inquiring about the procedures available to ensure transparency and integrity in the judicial system.

Concerns have escalated particularly when high-ranking officials are implicated, as the integrity of the entire judiciary can be called into question. This controversy may potentially necessitate a thorough investigation into the processes that govern judicial conduct.

Judicial Accountability Mechanisms in India

In India, there are various mechanisms designed to investigate allegations against judges, including an in-house inquiry system. This involves a process where complaints are assessed and dealt with internally, allowing for a degree of privacy and discretion until the matter gains public interest.

However, critics argue that the in-house mechanism may lack sufficient transparency, as it can sometimes lead to perceptions of a lack of accountability. The procedures may not be rigorous enough to adequately address serious misconduct allegations, potentially undermining public trust in judicial institutions.

In extreme cases, impeachment remains a constitutional provision to remove a judge from office, although this route is considered rare and complicated. The impeachment process requires a two-thirds majority in both Houses of Parliament, making it a high threshold for action against judges.

The barriers to initiating impeachment highlight the broader challenges faced when prosecuting allegations within the judiciary. Critics often call for reforms to streamline these mechanisms and enhance accountability measures.

The Impact of Public Perception on Judicial Accountability

Public perception plays an integral role in the ongoing discourse surrounding judicial accountability. The recent controversies can contribute to a growing sentiment of scepticism about the independence and integrity of the judiciary. When that perception is tarnished, it can have cascading effects on public confidence in legal proceedings.

Furthermore, heightened scrutiny from the media and civil society can also influence how judicial directives are executed. The involvement of these external entities can lead to increased dialogues about the need for reform in accountability practices.

The judiciary itself faces a dilemma in maintaining its autonomy while simultaneously addressing public concerns around accountability. Stakeholders within the legal system are contemplating how to balance these competing interests without compromising judicial independence.

Ultimately, the developments surrounding the Rajasthan High Court’s Acting Chief Justice may serve as a catalyst for necessary discussions regarding the adequacy and effectiveness of existing mechanisms aimed at upholding judicial standards and integrity.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share

The post Rajasthan High Court Controversy Sparks Debate on Judicial Accountability appeared first on The CSR Journal.

This order was issued on August 10, indicating that the hiring activities associated with the university’s advertisement from June 11 have now been suspended. The court has stated that the recruitment process will remain on hold until the next scheduled hearing on September 17, 2026.

The case was presided over by Justice Sandeep Moudgil. During the hearing, lawyers representing the respondents informed the court that the recruitment had already been halted in light of the ongoing legal proceedings.

Allegations of Examination Irregularities

BJP MP Sambit Patra has suggested that the recruitment examination was marred by allegations of a paper leak. Patra accused the Aam Aadmi Party-led Punjab government of initially downplaying these claims as mere irregularities.

“Patra noted, “A few hours ago, the Punjab and Haryana High Court issued a significant decision. Last month, examinations for the pharmacy officer recruitment, which were conducted in July 2026 by BFUHS, were alleged to have involved a leak.” He expressed concern over the government’s initial stance on the issue.

According to Patra, the government took steps to suspend those allegedly involved in misconduct but failed to halt the examination process or conduct a fresh test. “They have claimed these were simply irregularities and that those responsible had been suspended, yet the examination continued,” he said.

Court’s Directives and Upcoming Hearing

The High Court’s ruling explicitly states that appointments for the 454 positions cannot proceed during the review of the ongoing petition. It has allowed the State and other related parties to provide their responses while mandating that any replies be submitted at least one week in advance of the next hearing.

This interim order will continue to be effective until the judiciary reconvenes on September 17. The court’s decision reflects ongoing concerns about the transparency and integrity of the recruitment process.

Patra also claimed that Punjab Chief Minister Bhagwant Mann had consistently denied the occurrence of a paper leak. “This demonstrates that both the Congress party and the Aam Aadmi Party possess double standards,” he remarked, emphasising the need for accountability in governance.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share

The post Punjab and Haryana High Court Stays Recruitment of Pharmacy Officers Amid Allegations appeared first on The CSR Journal.

The post CJI सूर्यकांत की दोटूक: हर विवाद का पहला मंच सुप्रीम कोर्ट नहीं, पहले हाईकोर्ट जाएं appeared first on The CSR Journal.

The sentence relates to Raveendran’s previous legal disputes, which have been exacerbated by the declining fortunes of Byju’s. The company, once a leader in the edtech sector and operated by Think & Learn Pvt Ltd, has faced substantial difficulties, including allegations of lapses in corporate governance after a phase of rapid growth.

Currently, Raveendran is not in Singapore. His legal representative, J. Michael McNutt of the law firm Lazareff Le Bars, stated that the order does not have immediate implications unless Raveendran decides to enter Singapore. McNutt further explained that Raveendran could appeal the court’s decision at that time.

Implications of the Court’s Ruling

According to McNutt, the court’s order predominantly affects Raveendran’s ability to travel freely to Singapore. He emphasised that the entrepreneur denies having intentionally breached any court orders. McNutt confirmed that Raveendran plans to explore all legal avenues available to him. The legal team firmly maintains that their client did not intentionally infringe upon any court mandates.

Legal experts suggest that continuing legal action could further complicate Raveendran’s situation and Byju’s operational challenges. This case has gained attention not only due to the heavy fines involved but also owing to its implications for the edtech sector and bootstrapped startups.

The legal landscape is particularly intricate given the ongoing investigations and lawsuits related to Byju’s finances and operational integrity. As such, navigating these challenges will require substantial legal resources and strategy adjustments.

Ongoing Legal Challenges In Multiple Jurisdictions

Raveendran faces a multitude of legal battles beyond Singapore, with creditors and investors in different countries intensifying efforts to reclaim funds linked to the company’s financial instability. Reports indicate that in the United States, lenders are pursuing repayment connected to a defaulted loan totalling $1.2 billion. This debt plays a critical role in the growing financial woes surrounding Byju’s.

In addition to American creditors, Raveendran is also embroiled in litigation in Singapore. One significant claimant is a subsidiary of the Qatar Investment Authority (QIA), which had previously invested in Byju’s during a funding round when the company was facing layoffs. The QIA has welcomed the latest ruling from the Singapore High Court and plans to continue its legal pursuit against Raveendran.

The culmination of these challenges significantly highlights the precarious position of Byju’s as it strives to navigate its turbulent path in the market. Strategically, Raveendran’s legal and financial manoeuvres will determine not only his personal situation but also the broader implications for the company and the stakeholders involved.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share

The post Byju’s Founder Faces Legal Hurdles Following Court Decision appeared first on The CSR Journal.

धमाकों से फैली दहशत

अहमदाबाद सीरियल ब्लास्ट में 56 लोग मारे गए थे और सैकड़ों घायल हुए थे। यह धमाके 26 जुलाई 2008 को हुए थे और इनकी तीव्रता ने पूरे शहर को हिलाकर रख दिया था। पुलिस और कानून प्रवर्तन एजेंसियों ने इन धमाकों की जांच में कई महीने लगाए थे। इस दौरान कई संदिग्धों को गिरफ्तार किया गया था, जिनमें से कुछ को बाद में अरेस्ट कर दिया गया।

फैसले का महत्व

गुजरात हाई कोर्ट का यह फैसला न केवल न्याय की एक मिसाल है, बल्कि यह सुरक्षा बलों और जांच एजेंसियों के प्रयासों की भी सराहना करता है। इस निर्णय से उन लोगों को भी संदेश गया है, जो ऐसे अपराधों में संलिप्त होते हैं, कि सज़ा मिलना निश्चित है। मामले की सुनवाई के दौरान कई गवाहों के बयान और सबूत प्रस्तुत किए गए थे, जिससे न्यायिक प्रक्रिया को समुचित रूप से आगे बढ़ाने में मदद मिली।

संबंधित प्रतिक्रिया

जिन परिवारों ने इस विस्फोट में अपने प्रियजनों को खोया है, उनके लिए यह फैसला एक तरह की स्थिरता लाने वाला है। कई पीड़ित परिवारों ने उच्च न्यायालय के इस निर्णय को सही ठहराया है और इसे कानून और व्यवस्था के तहत एक सकारात्मक कदम माना है। इस फैसले ने यह भी स्पष्ट कर दिया है कि आतंकवादियों के खिलाफ सख्त कार्रवाई की आवश्यकता है।

आगे की प्रक्रिया

इस फैसले के बाद, दोषियों के वकील ने उच्च न्यायालय के निर्णय के खिलाफ सर्वोच्च न्यायालय में अपील करने की योजना बनायी है। उन्हें उम्मीद है कि वहां पर उन्हें एक बार फिर से मौका मिलेगा। हालांकि, यह देखना दिलचस्प होगा कि सर्वोच्च न्यायालय किस प्रकार से इस मामले को लेता है।

धन से जुड़ी सजा

अहमदाबाद सीरियल ब्लास्ट मामले में दोषियों को आर्थिक रूप से भी सजा दी गई है। अदालत ने निर्णय दिया है कि दोषियों को पीड़ितों के परिवारों को मुआवजा देना होगा, जिससे इन लोगों की आर्थिक स्थिति भी सुधरेगी। यह पहल इस बात का संकेत है कि केवल सजा देना ही काफी नहीं है, बल्कि पीड़ितों की मदद करना भी आवश्यक है।

समाज पर असर

हाई कोर्ट के निर्णय का व्यापक असर भारतीय समाज पर देखने को मिल सकता है। यह फैसला न केवल न्याय का प्रतीक है, बल्कि इससे यह भी दर्शाता है कि हम सभी को मिलकर ऐसी घटनाओं के खिलाफ खड़ा होना होगा। समाज में एकजुटता और सुरक्षा सुनिश्चित करना अब हमारी प्राथमिकता होनी चाहिए।

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share

The post गुजरात हाई कोर्ट का बड़ा फैसला: अहमदाबाद सीरियल ब्लास्ट में 38 दोषियों की फांसी बरकरार appeared first on The CSR Journal.

The special court had sentenced 38 convicts to death and awarded life imprisonment to 11 others in connection with the coordinated bombings that killed 56 people and injured more than 200 across Ahmedabad on July 26, 2008.

Gujarat High Court Upholds Special Court Verdict

The High Court pronounced its verdict on appeals filed by the convicts against the judgment delivered by the special court in 2022.

The trial court had awarded the death penalty to 38 convicts and sentenced another 11 to life imprisonment for their involvement in the serial blasts.

The Gujarat High Court upheld the sentences awarded to all the convicts, maintaining the punishments imposed by the special court.

21 Bomb Blasts Hit Ahmedabad Within 70 Minutes

On July 26, 2008, Ahmedabad was struck by 21 bomb explosions at 20 locations within a span of around 70 minutes.

The coordinated attacks triggered panic across the city, killing 56 people and leaving more than 200 others injured.

The Islamic terror group Harkat-ul-Jihad-al-Islami (HuJI) had claimed responsibility for the attacks.

NIA Files Forensic Report In Delhi Red Fort Blast Case

Meanwhile, proceedings continued in a separate terror case involving the November 2025 Red Fort car bomb blast in Delhi.

The National Investigation Agency (NIA) filed a forensic report related to the body parts of those killed in the explosion, following which the court listed the matter for scrutiny of the report.

According to the agency, the high-intensity Vehicle-Borne Improvised Explosive Device explosion killed 11 people, injured several others and caused extensive damage to nearby property.

The NIA produced nine accused before Special Judge Pitambar Dutt, who extended their judicial custody until the next hearing.

The court has listed the matter for further proceedings on July 13.

NIA Has Chargesheeted 10 Accused In Red Fort Blast Case

The NIA has already filed a chargesheet against 10 accused, including Shaheen Saeed and others, in connection with the Red Fort blast case.

A supplementary chargesheet against Zamir Ahmed Ahangar and Tufail Ahmed Bhat is also pending consideration before the NIA court at Patiala.

The agency filed the supplementary chargesheet against Zamir, Tufail and an absconding accused in connection with the November 2025 blast.

Zamir and Tufail were arrested in February 2026 after the NIA had filed its main chargesheet in the case.

The agency has alleged that the two accused were involved in collecting arms and ammunition.

According to the NIA, Zamir received a rifle, a pistol and live ammunition from Umar, Irfan and Adil.

Both Zamir and Tufail are allegedly associated with Ansar Ghazwat-ul-Hind.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share

The post Gujarat High Court Upholds Sentences Of All Convicts In 2008 Ahmedabad Serial Blasts Case appeared first on The CSR Journal.