आज गुरुवार, 21 अक्टूबर को नेस्ले इंडिया के शेयरों में लगभग 3.7 प्रतिशत की गिरावट देखने को मिली है। यह शेयर आज 1187.10 रुपये के स्तर पर गिर गया, जो पिछले छह महीनों का इसका सबसे निचला स्तर है। इस गिरावट का मुख्य कारण भारतीय खाद्य सुरक्षा और मानक प्राधिकरण (FSSAI) द्वारा जारी नोटिस है। FSSAI ने नेस्ले को उसके कुछ प्रोडक्ट्स में ‘भ्रामक दावे’ करने के संबंध में चेतावनी दी है। यह स्थिति निवेशकों के लिए चिंता का विषय बन गई है।

ज़ाइडस वेलनेस पर भी FSSAI का शिकंजा

वहीं, ज़ाइडस वेलनेस के शेयरों में भी 3 प्रतिशत से अधिक की गिरावट आई है। यह शेयर 477.10 रुपये के स्तर से नीचे आ गया, जो पिछले छह महीनों का उसका सबसे निचला स्तर है। FSSAI ने ज़ाइडस वेलनेस को भी उसके उत्पाद ‘कॉम्प्लान’ के दावों के संबंध में नोटिस जारी किया है। इससे इन दोनों कंपनियों के शेयरों पर दबाव देखने को मिला है।

FSSAI का नोटिस और कंपनियों की प्रतिक्रिया

FSSAI ने नेस्ले इंडिया को उसके दो उत्पादों लैक्टोजेन प्रो 1 पाउडर और नैन एक्सेला प्रो स्टेज 1 के दावों को लेकर नोटिस जारी किया है। इसके अलावा, ज़ाइडस वेलनेस को भी उसके उत्पाद ‘कॉम्प्लान’ के दावों के संबंध में नोटिस मिला है। FSSAI ने दोनों कंपनियों से कहा है कि वे अपने विज्ञापनों के सपोर्ट में वैज्ञानिक प्रमाण पेश करें।

नेस्ले इंडिया के शेयर प्राइस का हाल

फिलहाल NSE पर नेस्ले इंडिया के शेयर 1,187.20 रुपये पर ट्रेड कर रहे हैं। यह पिछले दिन की 1,223.90 रुपये की क्लोजिंग प्राइस से 3 प्रतिशत या 36.70 रुपये कम है। यह शेयर 1,210 रुपये पर खुला और गिरकर 1,184 रुपये के निचले स्तर तक आ गया। दोपहर के कारोबार में यह शेयर निफ्टी FMCG इंडेक्स में सबसे ज्यादा गिरने वाला स्टॉक रहा। उस समय निफ्टी FMCG इंडेक्स लगभग 2 प्रतिशत गिरकर 42,910 पर दिख रहा था।

ज़ाइडस वेलनेस के शेयर प्राइस का हाल

NSE पर दोपहर के कारोबार में ज़ाइडस वेलनेस के शेयर 476.20 रुपये पर ट्रेड कर रहे थे। यह पिछले दिन के 492 रुपये के क्लोजिंग भाव से 3.21 प्रतिशत या 15.80 रुपये नीचे है। यह शेयर आज 486.05 रुपये पर खुला और गिरकर 475.10 रुपये के निचले स्तर तक आ गया। इस गिरावट ने निवेशकों के बीच चिंता बढ़ा दी है।

FSSAI के दावों की गंभीरता

FSSAI ने नेस्ले इंडिया को यह बताने के लिए कहा है कि FSS एक्ट, 2006 के तहत उनके खिलाफ कार्रवाई क्यों न शुरू की जाए। लैक्टोजेन प्रो 1 पाउडर के लिए जारी नोटिस में FSSAI ने कहा है कि कंपनी ने अपनी लेबलिंग और विज्ञापन सामग्री में यह दावा किया है कि इस उत्पाद में ‘व्हे प्रोटीन’ है, जो दूध के प्रोटीन का ही एक हिस्सा है और आसानी से पच जाता है। FSSAI ने इस दावे के समर्थन में वैज्ञानिक प्रमाण मांगें हैं।

ज़ाइडस वेलनेस के कॉम्प्लान का मामला

ज़ाइडस वेलनेस के ‘कॉम्प्लान’ के मामले में FSSAI ने कहा है कि इस प्रोडक्ट के लेबल पर दो बच्चों की तस्वीरें हैं और इसमें ‘2 गुना तेज़ विकास’, ‘एकाग्रता और याददाश्त में सहायक’ जैसे दावे किए गए हैं। ये दावे FSS (विज्ञापन और दावे) विनियम, 2018 का उल्लंघन करते पाए गए हैं। FSSAI ने ज़ाइडस से ऐसे दावों के लिए वैज्ञानिक प्रमाण देने को कहा है।

नेस्ले इंडिया का रिएक्शन

इस बीच, नेस्ले इंडिया ने कहा है कि उसने अपने शिशु पोषण उत्पाद ‘लैक्टोजेन प्रो 1’ की लेबलिंग से जुड़े दावों को लेकर FSSAI को एक विस्तृत जवाब सौंप दिया है। कंपनी ने इस मामले पर FSSAI को अपना विस्तृत जवाब पहले ही सौंप दिया है। यह स्थिति दोनों कंपनियों के लिए चुनौतीपूर्ण साबित हो रही है।

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store – https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share

The post Stocks in News: FSSAI की कार्रवाई के बाद Nestlé और Zydus Wellness के शेयर करीब 4% टूटे appeared first on The CSR Journal.

According to FSSAI, the objective is to ensure that infant nutrition products adhere to age-appropriate nutritional requirements, particularly focusing on reducing exposure to added sugars during the critical early stages of life. The draft amendment seeks to strengthen the existing regulatory framework that governs the nutritional composition, quality, and safety standards for infant nutrition products aimed at children from birth to 24 months.

Under current regulations, lactose and glucose polymers are the preferred carbohydrate sources, while sucrose and fructose can only be added within specified limits. The FSSAI’s new proposal aims to eliminate these sugars entirely from infant food products, reinforcing the importance of appropriate nutrition during the first six months, which is crucial for healthy growth and development.

Health Risks Associated with Added Sugars

The proposed ban on added sugars aligns with broader public health initiatives aimed at addressing the risks associated with early exposure to such ingredients. Concerns have been raised regarding dietary factors that contribute to childhood obesity and other health issues. The FSSAI’s move also supports public health recommendations advocating for exclusive breastfeeding during the initial six months of an infant’s life.

Research has indicated that infants exposed to high levels of added sugars may face immediate health risks, including dental issues such as tooth decay and cavities. Additionally, there are long-term health implications, including an increased risk of childhood obesity and Type 2 diabetes due to insulin resistance. By tightening the standards for infant nutrition products, the FSSAI aims to promote healthier feeding practices and ensure that manufacturers prioritise the specific nutritional needs of young infants.

In its proposal, FSSAI emphasises the need for manufacturers to adopt formulations that are free from added sugars, thereby enhancing the quality of infant food products available in the market. The authority’s commitment to improving infant nutrition is reflected in its efforts to create a regulatory environment that supports healthy growth and development during these formative months.

Public Consultation Process

The draft notification has been made available for public consultation, allowing stakeholders to provide their objections and suggestions within a 60-day period following its publication in the Official Gazette on October 16. This consultation process is an essential part of the regulatory framework, ensuring that various perspectives are considered before finalising the amendment.

FSSAI will review the representations received during this period, which will inform the finalisation of the proposed ban on added sugars in infant foods. The regulatory changes will only be implemented once they have been officially notified, marking a significant step towards enhancing the nutritional standards for infant products in India.

By engaging with the public and industry stakeholders, FSSAI aims to foster a collaborative approach to improving infant nutrition, ultimately benefiting the health and well-being of infants across the country. The proposed amendment represents a proactive measure to safeguard the dietary needs of the youngest members of society.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store – https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share

The post FSSAI Proposes Ban on Added Sugars in Infant Foods for Babies Up to 6 appeared first on The CSR Journal.

The Food Safety and Standards Authority of India (FSSAI) has begun regulatory action against Zepto Marketplace Private Limited following allegations of delivering expired products. A complaint surfaced on social media platform X, claiming that two packets of besan, or gram flour, were delivered after their designated use-by date. The packets were marked with “USE BY: 12092026,” indicating they were past their expiry date.

FSSAI has requested that Zepto verify the complaint and provide comprehensive details regarding the order, delivery, warehouse, seller, and product involved. The authority has also sought an explanation for the alleged lapse, alongside information on corrective measures that the company plans to implement. These measures include withdrawing the affected stock, notifying customers, and issuing refunds where applicable.

The notice aims to clarify the circumstances surrounding the order fulfilment and delivery process, as well as the steps Zepto intends to take to resolve the complaint. This scrutiny highlights the importance of compliance with food safety regulations in the quick-commerce sector.

Concerns Over Misleading Labels in Bakery Products

In a separate case, FSSAI has issued a notice to Bakelite Food Processing Private Limited regarding its product, “Malpani’s Bake-Lite Puneri Cream Roll,” which is sold through platforms such as Blinkit and Zepto. The regulator expressed concerns that the product’s name and presentation might mislead consumers about its ingredients, particularly regarding the presence of dairy products.

The notice pointed out that the ingredients listed included refined wheat flour, hydrogenated vegetable fat, margarine, and sugar, but did not mention any dairy components. FSSAI questioned the appropriateness of using the term “cream,” suggesting it could create a false impression about the nature of the filling. This case raises significant questions about whether food product names and presentations accurately reflect their ingredients, which is crucial for informed consumer choices.

Such regulatory actions aim to ensure that consumers are not misled by product names and that they can trust the information provided on labels. The implications of this case extend to broader issues of transparency and accountability in food marketing.

Health Claims Under Investigation for Supplement Products

FSSAI has also raised concerns regarding health-related claims associated with cranberry supplement products marketed by BMS Lifescience and Healthyhey Foods LLP. In the case of BMS Lifescience’s “Haog’s Cranberry Urinary Tract Health Capsules,” the authority noted an expired registration certificate, as well as potentially misleading claims related to health benefits.

The notice questioned the use of the FSSAI logo, which could imply certification or endorsement, and sought clarification on whether the product’s claims complied with regulatory requirements. Similar issues were identified with cranberry extract capsules from Healthyhey Foods LLP, which also faced scrutiny over labelling discrepancies and unapproved claims.

The investigation into these health claims underscores the necessity for transparency in the marketing of food supplements, particularly when such claims can significantly influence consumer perceptions and decisions regarding health products.

Adjudication Proceedings Against Storia Foods

FSSAI has initiated adjudication proceedings against Storia Foods & Beverages Private Limited concerning labelling claims on its pomegranate juice. The regulator highlighted that the product contained only 4 per cent pomegranate juice concentrate and 12 per cent apple juice concentrate, raising questions about the accuracy of the claim “Equivalent to 100% Fruit Juice (Reconstituted).”

Additionally, the authority scrutinised the claim of “No Added Sugar,” particularly in relation to naturally occurring fruit sugars. The proceedings focus on how the product’s composition and sugar content are communicated to consumers, as such claims can significantly affect buyer understanding and purchasing decisions.

The adjudication represents a distinct phase of regulatory action, separate from the notices issued to other companies. The companies involved have been directed to respond to the notices and take necessary actions as specified, highlighting the ongoing importance of compliance with food safety regulations in India.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store – https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share

The post FSSAI Acts Against Zepto and Food Companies Over Expired Products, Misleading Labels appeared first on The CSR Journal.

The raid was executed by a team from the Ahmedabad Municipal Corporation’s (AMC) Health Department. During the inspection, officials uncovered a significant quantity of both finished products and raw materials stored on the premises. The total weight of the seized items amounted to 10,630 kg, including approximately 5,000 kg of finished products that were reportedly ready for market sale.

Details of the Allegations Against the Factory

Mahendra Patel, a Food Safety Officer with the AMC, stated that the factory was allegedly substituting potatoes for tomatoes in its ketchup production. The potatoes were processed into a paste and subsequently converted into powder. This powder was mixed with water, along with artificial colours and flavours, to create a product that was allegedly marketed as tomato ketchup.

During the raid, officials discovered large stainless-steel mixing vessels filled with a red sauce, packaged ketchup sachets, and sacks of raw materials. Additionally, plastic drums containing paste-like substances and containers of finished products were found inside the factory. The storage area, which housed both ingredients and packaged goods, provided a concerning visual account of the factory’s operations.

Authorities suspect that these products were being sold as tomato-based condiments despite containing no actual tomatoes. The use of artificial colours and flavours has raised significant concerns regarding the potential health risks associated with consuming these products.

Next Steps Following the Raid

In the aftermath of the raid, the Health Department collected five samples from the factory for laboratory testing. These samples will be analysed to establish the ingredients used and verify the manufacturing process. The factory premises have been sealed, and proceedings have begun to revoke the factory’s licence. Distribution of the stock found at the facility has also been halted.

Further actions will be determined once the laboratory reports are received. The results are expected to assist officials in establishing whether the products violated food safety standards and in deciding the appropriate measures against those responsible.

This raid comes just two days after a similar operation was conducted by the AMC’s Health Department at a factory in Behrampura, where tomato ketchup was allegedly produced through a comparable process. During that operation, approximately 2,000 kg of suspected adulterated products were seized. With another facility now under scrutiny in Gota, the department’s actions have highlighted the ongoing issue of tomato-free ketchup production in the city. Authorities are anticipated to proceed further based on the laboratory findings and the results of the licensing proceedings.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store – https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share

The post Gujarat Factory Sealed After Potato Paste, Colour Found in Tomato Ketchup Production appeared first on The CSR Journal.

Currently, the regulations permit the use of lactose and glucose polymers as the primary carbohydrate sources in infant nutrition products. However, manufacturers are allowed to incorporate sucrose and/or fructose as carbohydrate sources when necessary, provided they comply with specified limits. The new amendment proposes to eliminate this allowance for products aimed at infants under six months, stating that “sucrose and fructose shall not be added in the products intended for infants up to the age of 6 months.”

If the amendment is enacted, it will prevent manufacturers from including these sugars in infant nutrition products designed for this age group, thereby aiming to enhance the overall quality of infant food.

Rationale Behind the Proposed Changes

FSSAI has indicated that the first six months of an infant’s life are crucial for growth and development, making adequate nutrition essential during this period. The proposed amendment intends to ensure that products formulated for young infants meet their nutritional needs without unnecessary added sugars. This initiative also aligns with broader public health goals to mitigate the risks associated with early exposure to added sugars, which can contribute to childhood obesity and other health issues.

The proposed restrictions are consistent with established public health recommendations that advocate for exclusive breastfeeding for the first six months after birth. By enforcing stricter nutritional requirements for infant food products, FSSAI aims to promote formulations that address the specific dietary requirements of infants during their formative months.

The existing regulations already outline comprehensive requirements regarding the nutritional composition, quality, and safety of various categories of infant nutrition products intended for children from birth to 24 months. This amendment seeks to further refine these standards.

Next Steps for the Draft Amendment

FSSAI has made the draft amendment available for public review to gather feedback from stakeholders. Individuals and organisations can submit objections and suggestions within 60 days from the date the Official Gazette containing the notification is made public. The food regulator will assess the feedback received during this period before finalising the amendment.

The proposed changes reflect FSSAI’s commitment to advancing science-based food safety regulations and encouraging responsible manufacturing practices. The emphasis on protecting children’s nutritional health from infancy is a significant aspect of this initiative.

In summary, the draft amendment aims to reinforce the nutritional standards for infant food products by prohibiting the addition of sucrose and fructose. This move is part of a broader effort to ensure that infants receive the essential nutrients they require during their early development, thereby supporting their long-term health and well-being.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store – https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share

The post FSSAI Proposes Ban on Sucrose and Fructose in Infant Foods Under Six appeared first on The CSR Journal.

During court proceedings, Additional Solicitor General Anil Singh, representing the FSSAI, stated that the sales would only be permitted if the manufacturer complied with the proposed labelling revision. Mohan Rocky Springwater Pvt Ltd, the company behind Old Monk, is determined to challenge this stipulation.

Financial Impact and Employment Issues

Advocate Venkatesh Dhond, representing the manufacturer, informed the court that the restrictions imposed on sales from its unit in Thane district have led to significant corporate losses exceeding Rs 500 crore. The effects of this restriction are not limited to the company alone; the Maharashtra excise department is estimated to have lost around Rs 350 crore in revenue. Moreover, approximately 300 employees have reportedly been rendered idle due to this embargo on sales.

Dhond emphasised the inconsistency in the market, noting that Old Monk is still available for purchase in other Indian states, contrasting sharply with its restricted status in Maharashtra. This discrepancy forms a critical part of the manufacturer’s argument against the FSSAI’s prohibition order.

Previous hearings at the High Court had not favoured an immediate interim stay on the ban, prompting the company to seek a more formal resolution through the judicial process.

Attempts to Resolve the Dispute

In a bid to address the concerns raised by the FSSAI, Old Monk’s manufacturer proposed new draft labels that excluded contested age descriptors and ensured a clear indication of “added flavour” in the product. However, these revised labels were reportedly not approved by the regulator, signalling a lack of progress in negotiations between the two parties.

The unyielding stance from the FSSAI has led the company to request the court to assess its case based on its merits. The judges, Chief Justice MC Tripathi and Justice Advait Sethna, have agreed to hear the matter on October 23, providing a timeline for resolution.

The underlying issue in this dispute revolves around the FSSAI’s stance on liquor products that utilise artificial or nature-identical rum flavouring. The regulator has outlined that such additions can mislead consumers regarding the product’s true composition if not labelled accurately. There are also concerns raised about age-related descriptors on Old Monk labels, such as “7 years old blended” and “very old vatted,” which the FSSAI claims do not meet necessary labelling regulations.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share

The post Old Monk Reports Rs 500 Crore Loss Amid Labelling Dispute appeared first on The CSR Journal.

In addition to staying the primary order, the court also cancelled the follow-up communication from the FSSAI dated July 17, 2026. This communication had instructed the Commissioners of Food Safety across all States and Union Territories to enforce the previous directive against RCPL. The beverage company had approached the High Court to contest both the original order and the subsequent enforcement communication.

The court’s ruling grants temporary relief to RCPL, highlighting that the FSSAI’s directives were issued without a prior show-cause notice, which is a crucial component of procedural fairness. The absence of this notice meant that RCPL was not given an opportunity to defend itself before the imposition of the order.

Details of the Case and Legal Arguments

RCPL’s legal representation argued that the actions taken against the company were inconsistent with principles of natural justice. These principles dictate that any affected party should be afforded a fair chance to present its case prior to adverse decisions being made. The High Court acknowledged this point during its proceedings.

The court also noted that it is never too late for the authority to rectify procedural oversights, as indicated by submissions made during the hearings. This remark raises questions about the regulatory processes involved in issuing such directions.

The case revolves around the classification of beverages labelled as “Energy Drinks,” particularly those containing caffeine. The FSSAI had issued its directive to manufacturers regarding the categorization and description of high-caffeine beverages, which has implications for other products as well.

Implications for the Beverage Industry

The High Court’s decision is notable given that multiple beverage companies have raised similar legal challenges following the FSSAI’s new directives concerning the “Energy Drink” label. The outcome of this case could potentially set a precedent affecting numerous manufacturers within the sector.

RCPL’s legal team, which included Senior Advocate Sandeep Sethi, along with a collaborative effort from Karanjawala & Co, has expressed a commitment to contest the FSSAI’s actions vigorously. Senior Partner Ruby Singh Ahuja, along with Advocates Ravneet Kaur Malik, Piyush Sharma, Abhyuday Mishra, and Vani Aswal formed a robust representation for the case.

As the legal proceedings unfold, industry stakeholders will be closely monitoring developments, particularly regarding defining terms related to beverages and their subsequent regulatory compliance. The potential for enhanced clarity surrounding the classification of such products underscores the importance of this ongoing legal matter.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share

The post Delhi High Court Stays FSSAI Order Against Reliance’s Campa Energy Drink Label appeared first on The CSR Journal.

भारतीय खाद्य सुरक्षा एवं मानक प्राधिकरण (FSSAI) ने नेस्ले के लो फैट डेयरी व्हाइटनर के खिलाफ बड़ा एक्शन लिया है। एक प्रयोगशाला विश्लेषण के बाद, नेस्ले के इस प्रोडक्ट को असुरक्षित और निम्न गुणवत्ता वाला घोषित किया गया है। यह सैंपल नई दिल्ली के कनॉट प्लेस स्थित द ललित होटल से लिया गया था। FSSAI ने होटल को आदेश दिया है कि वह इस प्रोडक्ट की बिक्री को तुरंत बंद करे।

उपभोक्ताओं के लिए महत्वपूर्ण सलाह

FSSAI ने खाद्य व्यवसाय संचालकों को निर्देश दिया है कि वे उपभोक्ताओं को बताएंगे कि वे इस प्रोडक्ट के प्रभावित बैचों को खरीदने या सेवन करने से पहले आधिकारिक अपडेट का पालन करें। सभी संबंधित व्यक्तियों को प्रोडक्ट की जानकारी पूरी तरह से वैरिफाई करने की सलाह दी गई है। यह कदम उपभोक्ताओं की सुरक्षा सुनिश्चित करने के लिए उठाया गया है।

पहली बार नहीं, पहले भी हुई हैं कार्रवाई

यह पहली बार नहीं है, जब नेस्ले के किसी प्रोडक्ट पर FSSAI ने कार्रवाई की है। हाल ही में, शिशु आहार के एक नमूने में गुणवत्ता मानकों का उल्लंघन पाए जाने के बाद नेस्ले इंडिया लिमिटेड के खिलाफ कदम उठाए गए थे। इस मामले में, फॉलो-अप फॉर्मूले के एक नमूने में बायोटिन की मात्रा निम्न स्तर पर पाई गई थी।

मैगी का विवाद: एक पुराना मामला

2015 में, नेस्ले खाद्य नियामक FSSAI के शिकंजे में आया था जब उसके लोकप्रिय मैगी नूडल्स पर सीसे की अधिक मात्रा के कारण प्रतिबंध लगा था। उस समय कंपनी को बड़े पैमाने पर प्रोडक्ट्स को वापस मंगाने के लिए मजबूर होना पड़ा था। हालांकि, नए परीक्षणों के बाद मैगी फिर से बिक्री के लिए उपलब्ध हो गई। यह घटनाक्रम नेस्ले की गुणवत्ता सुनिश्चित करने की दिशा में बड़ा सवाल खड़ा करता है।

खाद्य सुरक्षा जांचों में तेजी

यह कार्रवाई ऐसे समय में हो रही है जब FSSAI देशभर में खाद्य सुरक्षा जांचों में तेजी लाने के लिए प्रतिबद्ध है। आने वाले दिनों में, संभवतः और भी खाद्य उत्पादों की जांच की जाएगी। इस कदम का मकसद उपभोक्ताओं को सुरक्षित, स्वस्थ और गुणवत्ता युक्त खाद्य पदार्थों की उपलब्धता सुनिश्चित करना है।

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share

The post Nestle के लो-फैट डेयरी व्हाइटनर पर बड़ा एक्शन, FSSAI ने घोषित किया असुरक्षित और घटिया appeared first on The CSR Journal.

गंदगी और सड़े हुए खाद्य पदार्थ मिले

FSSAI के अधिकारियों ने बताया कि निरीक्षण के दौरान होटल में कॉकरोच और बासी खाद्य पदार्थों की भरमार थी। खासकर, सड़े हुए टमाटर, पपीता और काजू जैसे खाद्य पदार्थ जो देखने में खराब थे। इसके अलावा, होटल के कमरे में जमा पानी, दुर्गंध और अन्य साफ-सफाई से जुड़ी समस्याएं भी सामने आईं।

खराब स्टोरेज की मिली जानकारी

अधिकारियों ने बताया कि मीट और शाकाहारी खाद्य पदार्थों को उचित तरीके से अलग नहीं रखा गया था। कोल्ड स्टोरेज की स्थिति भी चिंता का विषय रही, जहां से टपकने वाला कंडेन्सेशन खाद्य पदार्थों पर गिर रहा था। यह स्थिति खाद्य गुणवत्ता के लिए बहुत खतरनाक है, जिससे उपभोक्ताओं की सेहत पर खतरा मंडरा सकता है।

खाद्य पदार्थों की हुई तबाही

इस निरीक्षण के दौरान लगभग 74 किलोग्राम खाद्य पदार्थों को तुरंत नष्ट किया गया। FSSAI ने बताया कि इन खाद्य पदार्थों का मानकों के अनुरूप होना जरूरी था, लेकिन वे बिल्कुल अनुपयुक्त पाए गए। होटल को केवल 30 फीसदी कंप्लायंस स्कोर मिला, जिससे वह ‘Non-Compliant’ श्रेणी में आता है।

कंपनी पर लगे प्रतिबंध

FSSAI ने होटल को निर्देश दिया है कि लाइसेंस के निलंबन की अवधि के दौरान वह खाद्य सेवाओं से जुड़े सभी व्यावसायिक गतिविधियों को बंद रखें। होटल की इस स्थिति ने न केवल संसाधनों की बर्बादी की है, बल्कि उपभोक्ताओं की सेहत पर भी गंभीर सवाल उठाए हैं।

उपभोक्ताओं की सुरक्षा को प्राथमिकता

दिल्ली में खाद्य सुरक्षा मानकों का पालन करना बेहद जरूरी है। FSSAI की इस कार्रवाई से यह संदेश जाता है कि खाद्य सुरक्षा में कोई समझौता नहीं किया जाएगा। उपभोक्ताओं की सुरक्षा सबसे पहली प्राथमिकता है और ऐसे मामलों में सख्त कार्रवाई आवश्यक है।

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share

The post Delhi का ये होटल गंदगी में ‘फाइव स्टार’, FSSAI ने सस्पेंड किया लाइसेंस appeared first on The CSR Journal.

This order by the FSSAI argued that the company was violating regulations by classifying its product in a manner that could mislead consumers. The court’s decision to pause this ruling enables Red Bull to continue its use of the controversial label while the case is examined further.

Legal experts suggest that such interventions are significant not only for the parties involved but also for the overarching framework guiding food and beverage regulation in India. The ruling has implications for how similar products may be marketed in the future.

Implications for Beverage Industry

The decision to pause the FSSAI’s order brings to light the complexities surrounding product classifications in the beverage sector. Red Bull, as a leading player in this market, has been at the forefront of promoting energy drinks, which have gained substantial popularity among consumers.

There are concerns about the health implications associated with energy drinks, particularly regarding their caffeine and sugar content. Regulatory bodies have been vigilant in ensuring that consumers are not misled by product labels. This case is likely to influence how other brands position their energy products in compliance with safety regulations.

Industry analysts note that the outcome of this case could set a precedent for how energy drinks are categorised and marketed in India. As consumer awareness about health parameters increases, companies may need to adjust their messaging to align with regulatory expectations.

Next Steps in the Legal Proceedings

As the Delhi High Court reviews the case, further hearings will determine the final outcome. Both Red Bull and the FSSAI will have the opportunity to present their positions regarding the appropriate classification of the drink and the implications of its marketing strategies.

Observers anticipate that the court’s ruling may take several months, during which time the legal teams will prepare their arguments. The temporary stay allows Red Bull to maintain its marketing strategy while the dispute unfolds.

The case epitomises the tension between commercial interests and regulatory mandates, illustrating the challenges faced by both companies and regulators in navigating the modern consumer landscape. The resolution of this issue will likely have lasting impacts on consumer protection laws and marketing practices within the beverage sector.

Long or Short, get news the way you like. No ads. No redirections. Download Newspin and Stay Alert, The CSR Journal Mobile app, for fast, crisp, clean updates!

App Store –  https://apps.apple.com/in/app/newspin/id6746449540 

Google Play Store – https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.inventifweb.newspin&pcampaignid=web_share

The post Delhi High Court Stays FSSAI Order Against Red Bull’s ‘Energy Drink’ Label appeared first on The CSR Journal.